The surface is mostly covered in water, but compared the total volume of spherical earth, there's fuck all water.
this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
51 points (94.7% liked)
Asklemmy
44151 readers
1132 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
There's a difference between water and liquid.
Not sure if the solid core has more mass than the mantle.
In any case, I'd say it's like a balloon with something solid floating in the middle.
Boba tea?
I don't believe the "solid" core is solid in any sense of the word we can relate to; kinda like how Jupiters volume is mostly gas, yet 99% of that is at densities greater than the Mariana trench β where you would vaporize, and would feel more solid to us that anything we've experienced β and the "solid" core is more like a molten hydrogen liquid; hotter than the surface of the sun (but not hot enough for fusion).
Was referring to the stuff under the crust as the liquid not the water on top
But how liquid is the molten core? (I assume that's where this poster was going)
The correct answer is we don't know. There are novel (to us, anyway) states of iron, for example, that exist at extreme temperatures and pressures that have led scientists to postulate on the possible existence of a crystalized iron core, within the already solid inner core.
Metric fuck all, or is that freedom units?
Technically speaking, no. The mantle, which is solid, comprises about 2/3 of the Earth's mass. However at a planetary scale solids are not rigid enough to maintain their shape, so the Earth is closer to a liquid held together by gravity than to a rigid solid object. See this simulation for an interesting demonstration of its properties: https://youtu.be/kRlhlCWplqk
So it's like a water balloon full of dust/sand?
What I'm hearing is shepherds' pie, but spherical
I should get something to eat.
The mantle is a large part of the Earth's volume and even though it flows over geologic time scales, it is still considered solid. Then there's the crust and inner core, which are also considered solid. IMO the Earth is closer to a balloon filled with flour and a small iron ball in the center.
I believe this is also related to your question (the pitch drop experiment) but im too sleepy to integrate this to my answer above lol
Oh look! A Wikipedia article that answers that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_distribution_on_Earth?wprov=sfti1#
Of course thereβs theories out there that say thereβs a lot more water in the earth than weβve been able to calculate.
Real answer is that our best educated guesses are still that.
Liquid doesn't mean just water. I think what op was getting at that the molten core of the earth is in liquid(-ish?) form, thus the water balloon idea.
Depends upon how you're seeing liquid. If you just mean water, definitely not. If you mean things that behave like liquids behave or are in their liquid phase (is magma liquid here?) then I'm not sure
Nah, itβs more like a wet baseball. Only 0.02% water by mass. Source
Edit: My bad, you asked about liquid, not just water, so this is less relevant but Iβll leave it as some trivia.
I was referring to the stuff under the earths crust not the slime on top :P
Hey watch it, Iβm 70% slime!