this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1117 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5076 readers
2664 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The answer is 125 degrees but the triangle on the left has 190 degrees in it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Nah, the angle isn’t specified as a right angle. We can’t assume it’s 90° just because it’s drawn that way, because it isn’t drawn to scale.

Left triangle has 180° total. 60+40=100, which means that middle line is actually 80°, not 90. And since the opposite side is the inverse, we know it is 100° on the other side.

100+35=135. We know the right triangle also has 180° total, so to find the top corner we do 180-135=45. So that top corner of the right triangle is 45°, meaning x must be 135° on the opposite side.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I mean, it's visibly an acute angle wether it's labelled as such or not.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is the geometry version of those stupid poorly written math equations. Engagement bait.

The real answer is always "it's unsolveable due to poor/missing notation".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

But it's not unsolvable, just a misleading drawing...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It’s not unsolvable at all. The answer is x=135°. The triangles simply aren’t drawn to scale; The line between them isn’t a 90° angle, (even though it is drawn that way) because it is not specifically marked as 90° with a square angle mark.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Either this is drawn wrong or they broke geometry

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The triangles aren’t drawn to scale. The middle line isn’t a 90° angle, because it isn’t specifically marked with a square angle in the corner. Triangles always add up to 180°, so the angle in the left triangle is actually 80°, not 90°.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Right one does not depend on the left one. 3rd dimension for the win!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There's perils in being in 3d

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

And thinking so much differently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

That was a good one

[–] dnick 2 points 6 days ago

The angle formerly known as twitter

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago (2 children)

135, that's not a 90 degree angle in the problem. Just visually.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Oh that's just a cheap trick. You are right, it's 80 degrees despite looking like 90 degrees.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

You are right that is 80° so the value of x will be 135°

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Nah, the imagery tricks you. 180 degrees to a line. 180 degrees inside a triangle.

So you can gather the inside unlabeled angle on the triangle on the left is only 80 degrees: (180-[60+40])

So you then know it's 100 on the right side of that +35 leaves you with 45 degrees left for the top of the right one.

180-45=. 135 degrees

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Also if you add up all visible angles you get 135, so I'm sold on that alone. No no no, I won't hear any rebuttals.

load more comments
view more: next ›