this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
255 points (98.1% liked)

News

23409 readers
2670 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ex-president has pledged regulatory changes and other policies to boost big donors’ businesses, watchdogs say

As Donald Trump has ramped up fundraising from mega-donors for his 2024 presidential campaign and allied Super Pacs, he has increasingly pledged regulatory changes and other policies to boost their businesses, campaign-finance watchdogs have warned.

Experts say Trump’s political pitches and maneuverings are a clearly “transactional” chase for big checks, and pose a serious danger of major corruption in a US political system already flooded with powerful donors and lobbyists.

Trump’s transactional fundraising style has accelerated, and is underscored by his intense efforts to corral backing and big checks from Elon Musk – the billionaire who owns the social media platform X and is worth $263bn– plus fossil-fuel and crypto currency moguls, while dangling favorable federal policies and perks, say critics.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Corruption “dangers“? The guy’s fucking corrupt all the way to the core. It’s not a “danger“, it’s a certainty.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

And there's no danger in corruption if his administration has no intent to prosecute it. It's the goal.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump ~~’s court~~ i ~~ng of big donor~~ s ~~poses major~~ corrupt ~~ion dangers, experts warn~~

There. I think that covers it.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean shit, if corruption were the worst of him we’d be in a lot better shape than we are now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I did my best with the headline they gave me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

You did fine, but man is the headline underselling the problem. They got Al Capone for tax evasion, too, so here’s hoping history repeats.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

You telling me that a corrupt ~~conman~~ businessman with basically no morals is taking blatant quid pro quo bribes as part of his presidential campaign?? I can't believe it! /s

Seriously though, it's not a danger of him using the presidential seat for corrupt motives, it's a certainty. The world got lucky last time that his shoddy handling of Covid basically kneecapped his plans, but even then he still did near irreversible damage to the executive branch in the form of the now also blatantly corrupt SCOTUS judges. Don't give him a second chance.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

To the compromised six on the Supreme Court, a plain interpretation of the Constitution would indicate that it's gratuities when Trump does what are bribes and corruption to everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh they're solving this in maine with a clause in the 2010 SuperPAC laws that states that if there's a reasonable expectation of favors coming from donations than it's not allowed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I imagine the burden of proof is an issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Apparently they're going to use preexisting verdicts against some governor and one against Trump himself as the proof.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Too late, he’s already corrupt, as is everyone that associates with him. Every politician, every judge, every business owner that speaks his name in a positive light is corrupt to the core.

[–] JamesStallion 7 points 1 month ago

Sure Trump is corrupt, but is this really new?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If they're trying to act like every politician isn't completely owned, good luck with that.

Everyone is corrupt in a fundmentally corrupt system.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I guess the bar for being an expert isn’t very high these days.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Cute to think the United States finally cared about donor corruption.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Headline is 4 words (and a "'s") too long.

[–] greenshirtdenimjeans 1 points 1 month ago

There was no quid pro quo