I've been pretty down on modern Star Trek, but Lower Decks really shines out because IMO it's being made by people who clearly love Star Trek.
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
395 points (96.0% liked)
Risa
7174 readers
4 users here now
Star Trek memes and shitposts
Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You can't forget Strange New Worlds.
I've been a bit wobbly on Strange New Worlds. It's had some rough episodes, though overall I'm liking it and it's had some stellar episodes as well. Not as consistently good as Lower Decks, though.
All of Trek has had rough episodes, so I can't really hold it against Strange New Worlds. They do stand out more with only 10 episodes per season though
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
Low-er decks! Low-er decks!
Note: do not point out spelling mistakes on mods posts when possible
sen-sors detect no spelling mistakes, captain
Cannon
Boom.
Ok cannon
I honestly wasn't thinking I'd see my username corrupted, but I love the meme!
I've never personally understood why people get so obsessed with which works of fiction are more real. It's just a silly thing to worry about.
It adds to the cohesive narrative which can make the overall story telling experience better. When works are considered canon, that's usually an indicator that the overall franchise narrative is being cared for and thought of.
It can also mean that some aspects of one show can show up in another or vice versa. It's very cool to see a character you really like. Show up in another medium.
I fully agree, but I also think that there's too much focus these days on official canon. Copyright might mean that only one big giant corporation is allowed to make stories "set" in a particular universe, but that shouldn't mean that fans can't decide for themselves "nope, that was lame, I reject that particular bit." And if enough fans share that opinion the big giant corporation might want to listen to them.
load more comments
(2 replies)
For your second point, you can do that without worrying about canon. In fact it's easier if you don't.
For the first one, that can be interesting for a single coherent work with a single writer or team of writers that planned out at least an outline of a story beforehand, but there are rarely questions about canon for those kinds of stories. For something worked on for over half a century by hundreds if not thousands of people many of whom have very different visions for what it should all be about, in my experience it just leads to people getting mad at each other based on which of those visions they like more, and lots of self-contradictory nonsense crammed into the story to try and make it all work. That is just my opinion though. You are free to like different things than I do.
I just see canon as a toolbox for building one's personal fanon/headcanon from.
I’m mentally ill and tbh I cannot do non canon. I want the whole picture as painted, not with sticky notes everywhere.
Except Starbucks dad was a cylon, it’s the only way it all makes sense.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That’s like the perfect frame of Mariner. Wow.
Yeah TAS canonicity confirmed lets goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
M'Ress is on our list. 
Here’s hoping we get a m’ress appearance on Strange New worlds then.
Me too.
load more comments
(1 replies)
:SickoTendi:
Canon to the left of them, canon to the right of them!
...Canon in front of them contradicted and blundered.
…Here I am, stuck in the middle with you.
Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right...
Ah, someone who understands.
Exquisite work!
Well, a subspace anomaly turned the universe into a musical, who's to say another one in a parallel universe didn't turn everyone into cartoons?
I want the image trace you did of Mariner's head, it's so perfect
When did they animate a cannon?
Jim Kirk had one on each side of his torso.
No, that was spillover when his girdle started to fail