this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
86 points (96.7% liked)

micromobility - Ebikes, scooters, longboards: Whatever floats your goat, this is micromobility

2394 readers
74 users here now

Ebikes, bicycles, scooters, skateboards, longboards, eboards, motorcycles, skates, unicycles: Whatever floats your goat, this is all things micromobility!

"Transportation using lightweight vehicles such as bicycles or scooters, especially electric ones that may be borrowed as part of a self-service rental program in which people rent vehicles for short-term use within a town or city.

micromobility is seen as a potential solution to moving people more efficiently around cities"

Feel free to also check out

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

It's a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:

Don't be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.

Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.

Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nope, definitely not. That is wasted space. The back is for holding a backpack with a hydration reservoir. Anyway, I'm trying to gain strength and lose weight, not reduce my times by .02%.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Believe it or not, hydration packs have been shown to reduce aerodynamic drag for cyclists. There was a brief moment in pro cycling where riders wore them during time trials to shave a few tenths off their time. Strangely, the benefit of wearing one backward (on your chest) is a little bit better than wearing it on your back.

Needless to say, the UCI quickly banned hydration packs altogether.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

'cause the UCI are dickheads and want to live in 19..f@#k!ng..10. Let fixate on sock height, frame weight, aero tuck and shifter angles, but ignore road furniture, dickhead crowds assaulting riders and fine riders when the organisers cant organise (looking at you Vuelta)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

You're preaching to the choir, my friend.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Strangely, the benefit of wearing one backward (on your chest) is a little bit better than wearing it on your back.

That's fascinating and makes me wonder if wearing both at once was tested. I can't imagine it'd be comfortable though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

They definitely did try both but I don’t know if anyone was ever cheeky enough to wear that setup in an actual race.

Currently they’re putting race radios in the front, centered side to side, during TTs. Rumor has it that the UCI has already had to tell a couple of teams to stop using extra tape and stuff to embiggen the radio lump.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Seems like you'd get blown over if there's any crosswind...

[–] Grass 13 points 2 months ago

I feel like the bigg trux klan will just roll extra coal if they see you wearing this honestly idiotic lookig accessory.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Is this going to help my times on my Specialized S-Works Aethos? I'll do anything to shave off a single second. I shave my pubes into an aero shape already, so I'm running out of ways to optimize my aerodynamics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Depends on how well it manages to reduce drag. Make me get 5 more kph and we're talking

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Just fill that puppy with helium

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Get a recumbent instead, or for maximum speed gains, a velomobile.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_ 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not sure how much safety this really adds...

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Any safety it adds would probably be immediately offset by the added dangers of drivers being unable to see or steer effectively due to uncontrollable laughter.

[–] borth 18 points 2 months ago

The guy on the left is trying so hard 🤣

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Isn't that going to function like a sail if there's any crosswind? We're going to see cyclists floating through the air screaming and looking stupid while doing it lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Where I am, they're adding to their lycra getup - not content with having "Lidl" plastered across their arse as well as the "I shat myself" shorts bulge, they've added fishnet socks, and those television-sunglasses

Pretty sure they're not worried about looking more stupid lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

If your bike setup costs less than 7K, can you even honestly say you're a cyclist?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

HELLZ YEAH BROTHERS, SEND IT!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I would enjoy seeing that

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How would this reduce drag? Genuinely curious.

[–] litchralee 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

My understanding is that it has to do with form drag -- aka pressure drag -- which results in vortices forming in the "separation region" directly behind an airfoil. Or in this case, a rider. Essentially, the swirling of air behind the rider is turbulent -- which is why a hoodie might flop all over the place -- and that causes energy to be lost.

This video on Nebula (and YT as well) describes pressure drag at about the 02m30s mark for a sphere. But this graphic from Skybrary also shows the problem:

form drag

By providing a smooth surface for air to "cling" to, where it would otherwise form vortices in the separation region, should reduce form drag, although it will cause additional induced drag (aka friction with the new surface). But induced drag scales with speed and at cycling speeds, that's less a problem than it would be at airplane speeds.

A related drag-reducing device has been used for semi-truck trailers, and those have really been proven to reduce fuel consumption. Although the Wikipedia article does not describe in detail the aerodynamic principles at play.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Here's one site that has info on skirts (under the trailer to reduce side flow) and tails at the back. There's an image of a wind tunnel view that gives a good idea what it helps with. Those vortexes at the back of a flat trailer suck a lot of power.

image

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I'd much rather have my shirt going all floppy flappy in between the vortices and keeping my back cool than shaving 2 seconds off my relaxation cruises.

I know some people who would jump on this 100% and I should probably send them the article...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

My genuine thanks for taking the time to craft your lovely reply.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So would this also reduce the benefits of "catching drift" behind another rider?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Just guessing: trying to minimize vortexes and turbulences.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Das a garbage bag man

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Reminds me of those Civic owners who add a bunch of mods to make it more aerodynamic

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Nope! Nope, nope, nope... errrr NOPE!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

No. I probably should wear those padded crotch pants and clip-in shoes when I do distance but I'm low tech with biking. It's all about the journey.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_ 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I just wear regular clothes and hiking shoes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For my touring/gravel bike-packing set up, I usually wear bibs under a light-weight pair of shorts and shirt and trail-running shoes. For road bike, I go clipless with lightweight shorts/shirt. Usually we go 50mi or less on road rides, so I don't really feel like I need a chamois. I have SQ Labs saddles on my bikes. Since I switched, the bike-short padding basically became unnecessary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that's the one thing a pro biker friend gave me once, a very nice and very expensive bike seat. They look the same but makes a big difference

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The padded pants are non-negotiable to me... I do use clip-ons but cold probably live without it.

load more comments
view more: next ›