this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
237 points (81.3% liked)

Comic Strips

12921 readers
3108 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 76 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I don't get it. I mean, yeah, I get what's going on, I just don't get what makes it funny, or what point it's trying to make.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think its "Some people have strong reactions to public displays of affection "

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's affection, and there's... this. Some don't know the concept of "getting a room".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I am not alive to live up to your expectations! 😁 Some people don't know the concept of "nunya"

[–] Soulg 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You can't claim that when you're loudly making a spectacle out of yourself

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Everybody gonna draw the line in different places

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Doesn’t even have to be public, I never outgrew the childhood reaction of disgust to people making out. Like, why do I want to see a closeup shot of people kissing on my 65” 4k TV, even if it’s supposedly romantic…

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Stick around a bit. Unfunny comics is a hot new trend on this sub. Quality is going downhill.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

I initially thought this was one of those things where someone takes an actual comic and changes the text to make a different narrative. But this inscrutable mess seems to be the original...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Ah, also, it's butt ugly. Sry to the cartoonist, who is probably very nice, but that plasticky, slick looking tablet screen linework is starting to get to me. It's everywhere.

[–] wander1236 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It seems like they're making fun of people that are overly affectionate in a public place, like on a train

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I think it's the noise rather than simply the affection.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That is a truly incomprehensible second panel

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think English isn't their first language, lol

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is their first language Python, by any chance?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

for kiss in love:

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

That's why kids should learn Pascal first!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Language barrier doesn't explain the image itself

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Add a 've in the end of the "you" and you'll get what you want.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I don't mind PDA most of the time. It's cute when two people are completely lost in each other. I appreciate it when people bother being discreet, but even when they don't, it's usually not that invasive when people express themselves just between the two of them.

But then there's the attention whores, playing it up for the crowds.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Extreme mouth noises bother some people. Not that I'd ever call anyone out on a train over it, but the sound of loud wet kissing gives me the creepy-crawlies in the same way that hearing someone sloppily eating a particularly juicy apple does.

Thank Bose for noise-cancelling earbuds.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Just loudly whisper “oh yeah! Now grab her butt!” while groping yourself overtly.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is the small character at the end a recurring character of this comic?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I know I've seen a few others from this comic with that little guy.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

Ok, because it makes no sense without knowing that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Is that an AI comic? It's incomprehensible.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

damn, i miss her

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Can't beat me having a Zoom meeting with speaker on

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

An asexual watching most modern media

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Weird to see the proliferation over the years of think-pieces on the lack of libido in mainstream film. They act like it's evidence that America is dead from the waist down -- as if people can't just go watch sex whenever they want, without having to share the experience with an auditorium full of people. Depictions of sexuality have just become more private, that's all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

It's not just about sex, it's about lack of sexual tension or sensuality if you prefer to call it that. Zendaya and Tom Holland are actual couple but their on-screen chemistry as MJ and Peter Parker doesn't hold a candle to Sam Raimi movies.

Just one example among many.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

But old films still featured recognizable human bodies and human faces—bodies that could theoretically be achieved by a single person without the aid of a team of personal trainers, dieticians, private chefs, and chemists.

Well, but when those bodies we not the absolute epitome of military fitness, would you believe them doing the feats that they do in the movies.
Sure it's not 100% believable even now, but it kinda feels more "fine" if someone with stone-like protruding abs and pecs, takes a pillar to the torso and gets pushed back 50ft instead of getting squished.