this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
560 points (98.8% liked)

World News

38553 readers
2587 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

when society turns on the people with a conscience, the people with a conscience should turn on society. stop playing nice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The police and army do not protect the lives and freedom of individuals and they never have. They exist to create the conditions for business to do business. The law barely cares if you rape and murder some poor, powerless individual. But cause a big business some serious property damage? Oh no we can’t have that. Time to make an example of you.

[–] [email protected] 99 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I wonder if they understand what they’re encouraging by making the punishment for protests harsher than the punishments for direct action…not that that’s any of my business…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

arson time :)))) (in minecraft)

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago

Future excuses to crack down on “ecoterrorrists”?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Totally approrpiate, since they're terrorists endangering the well-being of everyone and the planet. Wait...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

I thought that was final Fantasy vii...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Kinda relevant: from the latest Private Eye. Just a little insight to the background of the people pushing for this outcome.

The Heritage Foundation who would have guessed it would be in the mix.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Meanwhile the UK still keeps on sending weapon shipments to an actively Genocidal Israel (they recently stopped but 20 out of 300 kinds of such exports).

It didn't took long to disprove the hopes of anybody who thought New Labour would be anything but a slightly less hard Right than the Tories.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rc__buggy 80 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Huh, up to 10 years for disruptive protest? Looks like it's only 8 years for a planned arson as long as you don't hurt anyone.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

In minecraft, that might send the wrong message.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So, if you plan an arson as a protest, is that 8 years or 18 years?

[–] rc__buggy 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

woah woah woah! I don't see a protest around here!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

As long as you don’t slowly walk or away from the burning building, you should be fine. IANAL

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Humanity is in mortal danger because of conservatism. If you aren't fighting conservatism, you aren't fighting climate change.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Neolibs sell us out to big oil just as much as neocons do. The root problem is capitalism. You cannot fight against climate change without fighting against capitalism

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Neoliberals are conservatives. Sadly, we do not have a progressive party in the U.S., so we must choose one of the conservative parties.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, liberalism, while far better isn't remotely close to being an adequate solution, but we all need to kick the can down the road by picking whatever least bad option is available to us.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Well, that's the funny bit: the government in the UK aren't the Conservatives, they're New Labour who are Neoliberals, by the standards of the rest of Europe they're even Hard Neoliberals.

Nowadays the difference between Conservatives and Liberals is really just the subset of Morality that's used in Identity Politics. They're certainly not different on Economics, not on Quality Of Life for the many, not on a good Future for our Children (which provides a Selfishness-driven reason be an Environmentalist, which is better than nothing) and certainly not on Environmentalism as a Moral posture.

We get some loud confrontational bullshit from both around various "-isms" all the while they're both doing what's best for the most wealthy of society and screw the rest (both present and future) and definitely screw anybody or anything that has no money and no capability for action, such as Nature.

You see that exact same shit in the US, by they way, as well as (in not quite as extreme form) in most of Europe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

If you aren't fighting conservatism you are actively destroying the planet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

I wish for the responsible judges, politicians and CEOs to get spat in the face by their own children for being the disgusting vile pieces of shit that they are. Sadly, too often, the apple does not fall far enough from the tree.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bruh, I misread the title at first and thought Big Oil was sentenced but the reality is just sad and angering.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

This is just one of countless examples that we live in capitalist plutocracies — ruled by corporations and the richest family dynasties who make up their majority shareholders — masquerading as "democracies". Sure, you can vote, but your only options are pre-approved.

When the people causing genocide, war, and ecocide are untouchable, their entire rule of law is invalid.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

FPTP-voting was designed by wealthy romans for the benefit of wealthy romans millenia ago and that people accept this type of democracy today is just bonkers to me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wonder what will happen to those prisoners once climate change gets even worse

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Texas inmates are being ‘cooked to death’ in extreme heat, complaint alleges

With the threat of another hot summer ahead, advocates asked a federal judge to declare 100-degree-plus conditions in uncooled Texas facilities unconstitutional.

...

The filing came from four nonprofit organizations who are joining a lawsuit originally filed last August by Bernie Tiede, an inmate who suffered a medical crisis after being housed in a Huntsville cell that reached temperatures exceeding 110 degrees. Tiede, a well-known offender whose 1996 murder of a wealthy widow inspired the film “Bernie,” was moved to an air-conditioned cell following a court order but he’s not guaranteed to stay there this year.

Concentration Camps.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh those damn Conservatives, such things would never happen under the rule of the Labour Party.

Right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey good thing is people are not as numb to the class warfare nowadays as before so your coy attempt to make this partisan isn't as effective.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Ah, yes. Thank you for reiterating my point by using instead of sarcasm the always very funny false accusation method.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If you are getting life in prison, might as well blow up an oil rig or something right?

If they go the route of severe punishment for not severe crimes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Good, they are part of the problem.

Proof

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I would be more likely to sympathize with JSO if they engaged in direct action against the oil industry instead of the general public. Stopping ambulances and electric cars in traffic does not get the world to abandon oil.

If you're going to commit a criminal offense regardless, at least target something that actively supports or benefits from the oil industry. They could go full Robin Hood, robbing businesses that support the oil industry and anonymously donating the proceeds to environmental causes. They could threaten car dealerships that sell ICE vehicles. While it is certainly illegal to burn down a gas station, at least that would be an attack on the object of their protests rather than the general public.

Nothing wrong with their stated cause, but their actions don't support that cause.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I can't imagine their prison sentences if they were actually thieves. Look at what they're getting for doing peaceful protests. People freak out when property is disturbed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

There have been direct actions recently - they get subjected to media blackout. If you want to shift public sentiment, you need eyeballs - they get eyeballs, and while responses are obviously mixed, they lean positive over time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Personally, I believe that criticising the efforts of activists with whom you share a cause is one of the lowest things you can do.

If I think there’s a better way, then I go do it, or at the very least I would participate in that group and try to bring them around to my way of thinking.

I definitely would not publicly criticise them because that doesn’t actually help the cause, it just damages it.

But of course, I can’t hold people to the same high expectations I hold of myself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (8 children)

"do something, anything as long as it doesn't affect me"

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (5 children)

They literally DID. The fact you don't know about it shows why they also do their publicity stunts.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›