Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

The study considers two main types of anti-piracy messaging. The first, prosocial messaging, asks pirates to consider the effect of their consumption on others, such as harm to film industry workers and how piracy compromises the quality of future productions.

This might work for some people, but folks who are familiar with Hollywood and Recording Industry accounting practices and payment schemes fully understand that this is a joke and those industries work fucking hard to not pay people a living wage.

It's an instant turn off and reminder whose pockets I'm really putting money into unless I'm supporting artists directly through something like Patreon or Bandcamp Fridays.

Real pro-social anti-piracy messaging would work on providing me with more options like Bandcamp Fridays, instead of making empty promises that they can renege on easily.

If they ever come out with a service that has everything, no commercial breaks, and you can download for offline use, those pirates will be in real trouble.

The discussion around special offers and pricing are actually why I don't subscribe to a lot of things.

It always feels like there's likely going to be a better deal if I just go away and wait and don't bother right now, which typically means I forget I was even interested.

I'd rather places be honest with pricing than play those variable price games because it always feels like I'm going to get scammed if I don't just do nothing and see if the price gets better.

Some platforms offer better prices in exchange for a one-year subscription commitment, but tiered discounts based on subscriber loyalty are much less common.

It's literally the opposite most of the time. The longer you stay the more expensive it becomes.

They keep saying piracy is a problem, but it seems more like licensing and greed is the problem.

I'd pay for a service that has everything - including the niche shit I watch, and can promise me that they'll have it forever, with the ability for offline watching.