this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
379 points (95.4% liked)

Vegan Circlejerk

229 readers
2 users here now

we absolutely respect veganism and what it stands for but

Unjerk: [email protected]

Yum: [email protected]

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I always wonder how vegans justify owning animals without their consent.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (10 children)

They don't. Pets aren't vegan.

Adopting non-human animals that would otherwise be killed for lack of facilities to care for them is basically the only way a vegan can end up with individual custody. Even then, it's harm reduction and not ideal.

Sanctuaries with professional full-time staff are better, but there are mass graves everywhere full of non-humans that there were no spots in a sanctuary for.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] TheSlad 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Outdoor feral cats are terrible for the environment/local fauna, dogs are domesticated so much that an outdoor feral life is miserable for them. It is absolutely compatible with veganism to give a home and care to cats and dogs who would otherwise be out on the streets. Buying specialty/novelty breeds from a breeder is not.

Veganism is less about absolutes, and more about reducing/not supporting animal harm and suffering wherever possible. Most vegans would agree that taking in a cat or dog and feeding them appropriate (meat) food is better overall then letting them roam feral. It is a very utilitarian view with regard to animals' wellbeing.

Im not vegan but I do have vegan relatives (with cats). Also you don't need to be vegan to agree with the points I brought up in the first paragraph.

[–] ArbitraryValue 9 points 1 week ago

Plenty of them do think it's wrong.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair i frequently consider the ethics of owning pets.

I am not vegan and have multiple pets. There has only be a short section of my life i lived without.

I don't think i could personally choose to own a dog, though i love the one my partner came with and have fond memories of those from my youth.

its just how restrictive their freedoms are. Almost always in a closed area or on a leash. It’s a conscious adult animal who are we to say its wrong for it to act on its instincts. They cant leave or complain much, Its practically enslavement.

Cats however can roam freely and it’s not uncommon here for cats to visit multiple homes, possible finding a different house to live. Cats only listen if they want to and instinctively act with no regard of your human ideal. So i see much less issue there having them a part of a family.

Now before every online wildlife enthusiast screams at me for not oppressing their roaming space. Wild cats are native where i live.. locking them in is locally considered very cruel.

The fact we have to discuss that is an argument for just not owning any pets though.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Outdoor cats kill many native animals and most places consider them an invasive species.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

They are only a meaningful problem where no native feline species are present. Asia, Africa and Europe (excluding islands) have native wild cats. House cats are a direct descendant of the African wild cat and have been domesticated and spread since ancient times. They can be a danger to the "genetic distinctiveness" of wild cats in some places. But they mostly are not the same level of danger to native species like they are in America and Australia.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I am aware and the damage they can do is legit, but people seem to automatically assume everyone lives in such place and i have been burned before.

As far as i am aware the concept of the family cat being a wild/stray that decides to just live at your house is an ancient dynamic here.

I once found a cat in need and took it to a vet where they found it had a chip. Returned it to the official owner, they already considered it the neighbors cat more than theirs and those neighbors hadn’t seen it for 3 months. They assumed it found some better place like rich lonely elders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tuxed 8 points 1 week ago

A friend had a cat move in voluntarily, so guess that would be one way. It's still an outdoor cat and can come and go as it pleases, it just seems to prefer staying there. It just gets food, scratches, and a place to stay, but is technically pretty much a wild animal. It behaves as if its lived with them for its whole life and tends to sleep next to my friend in her bed at night.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not vegan, that's all there is to it. Some keep animal companions since it's less harmful for them than a shelter but considering them "owned" is treating animals like property which is not vegan.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Trying to differentiate between owned pets and animal companions is splitting such fine hairs that it might as well be the same thing.

[–] Enkers 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ultimately, veganism relies on personal decisions of morality. It's not fully prescriptive and leaves room for differing opinions. The question here is whether or not the relationship is exploitative.

This leaves some room for nuance. There's a difference between purchasing a pet from a breeder, which adds further demand, and adopting an animal that would otherwise be euthanized, for example.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This leaves some room for nuance.

There is no room for nuance in a fucking circlejerk community, if you disagree with me you’re my number one enemy and I will destroy you and your reputation.

[–] Enkers 3 points 1 week ago

Uhh... Ohh... OK. Please don't hurt me! 😳

[–] Rekorse 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I fed my cat lettuce and now its first investigative documentary is coming out titled "Catastrophe"!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Words matter, mindset matters blah blah dont have the time for a "your hairsplitting vs. my careful differentiation" debate rn

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Claiming ownership of an animal that doesn’t (and is unable to) consent overrules careful differentiation of words and mindsets.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right which is why I said "less harmful than shelters" it's harm reduction not harmless

[–] Rekorse 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What if the animal is born in your property and never tries to leave because it wants to stay?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What then? Im not sure what your trying to say here. Animal on my property are my pets? Genuinely don't know what your hypothetical is meant to address?

[–] Rekorse 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Likely I misintepretted your post. I think I was saying its harmless in some cases not just harm reduction, but its not much point to make. Sorry!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you let a cat outside and they come back, that would be the closest you could get to an animal consenting, without actually talking to them. Also dogs naturally drifted to humans, so dogs chillling with humans is kind of their natural behaviour? The rest would be harder to justify.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But if you let a cat outside and it dies then you’re a murderer with blood on your hands.

If it goes on a murder rampage then you’re an accomplice to murder.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's what makes cats so great!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I think the guy running my cat over is the murderer, not me letting her outside.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I hope it's not a pixel fold.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

consumption 🤮

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Sorry sweaty, I did highschool bio. Cats need to eat ensouled foods.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Yeah where do you think their nine lives come from???

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

OBLONGATE CARONVIR

[–] Enkers 7 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

vegans. 🤣

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Best troll I've seen in a while. Can be taken either way!

Minus one point for low hanging fruit though, at this point even mentioning "diet" and "cat" in that sub will start a shit storm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Enkers 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Naeva, that phone is now evidence. I'll be confiscating it. 🤘

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Evidence of how based I am

[–] Enkers 5 points 1 week ago

A based rat is fine too.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So vegans can't have pets, but can vegans be pets OwO

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

ÙwÚ this is Dommé peta, now get in the cage or I'll flog you with some organic jute.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I like how you think girl!

load more comments
view more: next ›