this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
546 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2786 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
546
X's move on cemetery news shows 'how damaging this explosive story is to Trump': experts (www.rawstory.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Time to never use it again.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 209 points 3 months ago (6 children)

It's astonishing how completely and thoroughly fucked things are right now.

Think about it - the measure of how damaging a story might be to a deranged convicted felon presidential candidate is the eagerness with which a social media site owned by a billionaire troll and self-professed "free speech absolutist" tries to censor it.

How is that even possible? Does no one else recognize how jaw-droppingly insane these people are?

[–] [email protected] 60 points 3 months ago

Fat white pedos protect eachother

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago

It is insane and yet I've still never met a person in real life who uses X.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Don't forget who some of the investors are who helped Elon buy Twitter either. In case you missed the story.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

It is Vladimir Putin.

Saved you a click.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Welcome to the republikkklown party.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Very well put. It sometimes feels impossible to put this insanity into words at the very least, but you've done that, so thank you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

It's not that surprising. Russian oligarchs protect Putin, American oligarchs protect Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 3 months ago (4 children)

God I hope Harris wins so she can put the screws to Wish Version Iron Man.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

[–] mindbleach 1 points 3 months ago

Moray on deer

Homer: "Heh heh... I get it!"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

Temu version

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Iron Man 2 extra.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Fwiw, extras don’t have lines. If it weren’t a cameo(cause fame), he would be called a day player most likely. Larry Ellison is also apparently in there as himself somewhere.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Will she? She seems to be moving to the center and trying to play "bridge builder".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I don't know why you are getting down votes. She just said she will hire a Republican for the cabinet.

I don't want to pre judge anyone but if you still caucus for the GOP I am going to judge you and you are an immoral asshole.

Pull a Kristen Sinema and go independent if you still have conservative values that don't align with the GOP bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just move to Mastodon or that blue butterfly thingy.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the media would quit making articles out of X posts and hosting said posts for clickthroughs that'd be great.

They'll even link to X in articles specifically discussing how bad X or Musk is, like no drop is responsible for the flood

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

That would require "journalist" to still be a real career path. Media sites today have cut costs down to the point where "outsourced guy (about to be replaced by AI) who writes 1000 words about Xitter posts" is what passes for "news reporter" these days. What are those people supposed to do, actual work?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Brilliant!

The film's not bad either ;-)

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dude why on earth would you

Every time I visit Twitter I feel a strong desire to watch the video or whatever I came for and get the fuck out of there.

It is impossible to look over someone’s profile; as far as I can tell I get it sorted in “random bullshit from 2018” order and there is no way to change it

It had weird pop ups that mean nothing. Sign up with Google! Sign up with Apple! Once you join X, you can respond which means you’re allowed to read the comments! Here is someone who thinks Covid isn’t real!

It feels like going to some kind of sketchy site to download the pirated software I am looking for and get the fuck out before something happens to my computer

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

I believe it was a musk move that changed the default sort order from "latest first" to "most engaged" as an intentional inconvenience to encourage users to make accounts and log in.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Buying a company to end censorship, but suppressing stories you don't like, seems weird.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's definitely not why he bought Twitter though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's not, but that didn't stop him bragging that it was 😁

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The most damage isn't even from the altercation their staff had with a worker. It's the picture he had taken of himself giving the thumbs up and smiling like the tone deaf, sheltered rich kid that he always has been while standing behind of the tomb of someone who died because of the absolute trainwreck of a negotiating job he did with the Taliban.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

x? never heard of it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The platform formerly known as Twitter

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It's a joke based on what Prince was referred to as, in the '90s and '00s. He changed his name to some crazy symbol that no one knew how to pronounce, and he wouldn't clarify, so the media just referred to him as, "the artist formerly known as Prince."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You missed the real joke.

"So Twitter." is a way of saying "Fuck Elon, stil gonna call it Twitter." ;)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Seems, based on the other commenter's reply that we whooshed each other. Lol. Thanks for the clarification!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Ahhh, I know the reference, I didn't catch on that's the angle you were going for. Nicely done.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

...And it's speculated that the reason he did so was to get out of a record label contract with Warner Bros. For his part, it was deliberately unpronounceable.

[–] csm10495 6 points 3 months ago

Oh it's Twitter (currently known as X)

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not showing due reverence to dead soldiers is lesson 101 in how to lose an election.

Rishi Sunak did the same thing in the UK, and even the usual right wing red top press hauled him over the coals for it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

You'd think so, but he's been like this forever.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/gold-star-families-attack-trump-over-comments-about-ghazala-khan-n620671

This didn't sink his 2016 campaign and his NUMEROUS mentions of hate for wounded, captured, or dead soldiers won't in 2024.

Trump, for some unfathomable reason, is immune from things that would destroy the career of anyone else.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

All these narcissists, so desperate for attention, and so blind to the damage this attention will do to them.

How awesome (literally and figuratively) it is that they also own and control entire social media platforms.

Lol

This wasn’t true last time around, and might be the secret sauce that results in their own self defeat.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

“Explosive”

I’m tired of the superlatives, hyperbole, and exaggeration in the press.

It’s like that line from The Incredibles where Syndrome says, “When everyone’s super, no one will be.” When everything is “destroyed, crushed, hammered,” nothing is.

The sensationalized language is useless and I can’t even be bothered to read how someone got “slammed”.