this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
112 points (91.2% liked)

politics

19121 readers
3684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 months ago

Surprise! A right wing candidate is in support of a very right wing candidate: news at 11.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 27 points 2 months ago

Honestly, I find his overture to Harris absolutely fucking hilarious. What the fuck did he think the response was gonna be, considering how much of a goddamn wingnut he is?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

They're joining the guy who takes credit for operation warpspeed? The vaccine rollout program? Me thinks they don't care about their #1 issue as much as they say they do.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh noes! He's going to give all his 0.01% of the vote to Trump! What are we going to do?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

He's polling higher than that. Closer to like 5-6 percent in quite a few states. It's certainly enough to swing the election.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

I'm sure that'll work just fine.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Guys. I think maybe he was just a russian foil all along.

[–] Enkers 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't know. It seems to me like he's just a bog-standard grifter and wanted to trade some votes for a cushy do-nothing job.

He's obviously a spineless opportunist regardless.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Shadiest thing is that RFK called BOTH campaigns and offered his support and voters in exchange for cabinet positions.

https://youtu.be/cpiAjK_6XGc

And because Trump is a corrupt fuck who loves quid pro quo, don’t be surprised if he puts this anti science nut job in dangerous role.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

The plan has officially backfired.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Jail. Election fraud.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

As they always were going to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

They better make a decision pretty quickly - I know here in NC absentee ballots get sent out early September.