this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
166 points (97.7% liked)

politics

18828 readers
6042 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 month ago

This is so weird...

[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The context is Kamala isn't smart enough to run the country. He then pans to how beautiful she is by making comparisons with his wife (misogyny, she's beautiful but dumb). He then points out how of course they look different (race).

My interpretation is, in his own misogynistic racist way, he's trying to backpadel on the racism by calling her beautiful, but ends up coming off as misogynistic and still quite racist.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You forgot that he called her an actress

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Yeah, there was a lot of subtle negging happening.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He then pans to how beautiful she is by making comparisons with his wife (misogyny, she's beautiful but dumb).

Remember, Melania got into the US on an "Einstein" visa. Trump really might believe she's intelligent and would therefore be complimenting Harris by making that comparison.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I pulled context from the article. He called her dumb.

We need smart people, and people that have the ability to lead. She doesn’t have that ability. Can you imagine her with chairman Xi [Jinpin, President of the People’s Republic of China]

He then goes on about her looks.

I saw a picture of her on Time Magazine today. She looks like the most beautiful actress ever to live.

Essentially arguing that she faked her way into her position, coasting on her looks. This is a misogynistic view point.

Here he's drawing contrast, of course they're beautiful in there own way. But considering his history of racism and his racist base, this comes off as a dog whistle. She's beautiful but not white woman beautiful.

She looked very much like our great first lady, Melania,” Trump gushed as Musk met his comment with an awkward chuckle and a reserved, “yeah…”

She didn’t look like Camilla,” Trump said, purposely butchering Harris’ name. “Of course, she’s a beautiful woman and we’ll leave it at that.”

Leave it at that I interpret as, of course she's beautiful for a black woman. He leaves it at that as a dog whistle as he's realizing overt racism isn't helping him atm.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

For some reason it makes me feel extra icky that he referred to her as "our great first lady...". A title she doesn't have, no matter what he dreams. instead of just "my wife Melania", or "my beautiful wife Melania". Is he into cucking or something?

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Trump’s new political strategy is… gushing about his opponent’s looks and comparing her to his wife?

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guess I can see a similarity: they both don't want to sleep with Trump?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

People do tend to look pretty similar when they're trying to stay as far away from you as possible.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Fully leaning into the weird persona and trying to creep Harris out.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 month ago

Creepy weird

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even far-right ghouls can't deny it. Harris is a total prosecutie.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

is there any chance you got this phrase from Arrested Development?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just a slight 100% chance.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

"I outsourced it!"

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The headline is that Trump called Harris "beautiful", but the actual context was "the most beautiful actress". I think he was attempting to imply that she isn't qualified for the job at all, and is simply acting the part.

[–] Lucidlethargy 21 points 1 month ago

This is just garden variety sexism. But it's so out of place in 2024 that people aren't going to understand it.

This guy is a fucking fossil. I bet this worked great back when he was 50, and hanging out with a bunch of other old white guys.

He was 50 back in 1996. The fucking nineties. Vote this geriatric, senile douchebag off his soap box.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“She looked very much like our great first lady, Melania,” Trump gushed as Musk met his comment with an awkward chuckle and a reserved, “yeah…”

“She didn’t look like Camilla,” Trump said, purposely butchering Harris’ name. “Of course, she’s a beautiful woman and we’ll leave it at that.”

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Camilla, maybe as in Princess (?) Camilla, the wife of Charles III.?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

I’ll give him this one, Kamala Harris doesn’t look like Princess Camilla. Of course, she also doesn’t look like Melania…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

No it was more like "Ka-MAH-la"

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why didn't he have his teeth in? I was so confused on his lisp.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Afaik he has veneers so - possibly chomped too hard on a burnt ketchup steak?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Hours after the Trump-Musk interview, the tech tycoon said that he is also willing to interview Harris ahead of the November election.

“Happy to host Kamala on an 𝕏 Spaces too,” he wrote on his social media platform.

Harris’s campaign team meanwhile responded to the interview with a scathing statement calling Trump and Musk “self-obsessed rich guys who will sell out the middle class and who cannot run a livestream in the year 2024.”

Nah, she should do it. Would love to see Musk crumble by having to talk with someone who would do anything but spin around on his dick

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago

It just bolsters him though and doesn't do much for Harris.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago

Nope. Fuck his platform. Any movement that's not away from it puts us in a worse position.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I don't think she should lend credence to money buying an interview

[–] Mouselemming 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Eeeeewwww! Creepy Don shows his ugly face again!

The only way Trump can relate to any woman (or especially a little girl) is as a fuck object.

Just the thought makes you want to go take a shower, with bleach.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

He does recommend bleach, thanks for staying thematic.

That’s how tiny hands McGee likes the scrubbin’ done.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Beautiful" is far from the first word I'd use to describe our future Madam President. "Smart". "Dedicated". "Hard-Nosed". "Driven". "Focused".

Reduce her to her looks at your peril, shitgibbon.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I don't think she's particularly good looking, which may just be personal taste, but in any case doesn't matter in the slightest. She's not running for Miss America, she's running for President.

Not that I hold any particular love for beauty contests either, but - like Harris' looks - that's irrelevant here.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I just can’t anymore. He’s so fucking weird and shitty and creepy.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

marking a complete U-turn from the 2020 election where he sided with President Joe Biden and the Democrats.

Bullshit. This cannot possibly be true.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But he's been a right wing nut job since before 2020.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Sure, but he also knew that part of Biden's plans were EV tax credits, and nothing gets Elon more interested in something than a government hand-out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Government handouts, aka billionaire Viagra.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why is there not a clip of what he said in the article? The main video is of a completely different part. None of the links in the article seem to be the clip? I'm probably just dumb and not seeing it, or is it actually not there?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

The Independent - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Independent:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-elon-musk-melania-harris-beautiful-b2595502.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support