Baldur's Gate 3

"There aren't even messages in the menus to tell you about the useless cosmetics store! How can this even be a game?" -Ubisoft Dev Probably

I understand that there are plenty of reasons to dislike a game, ANY game, BG3 included, but how tf "has no right to exist" is supposed to be an argument? Based on what, according to whom, because what?

He wants a colorful amusement park RPG on rails that plays itself for him. He doesn't want to be bogged down by silly things like gameplay mechanics, he wants to paint by numbers.

You don't even climb a single radio tower let alone 300 of them.

I've played through Fallout 1 and 2 dozens of times.

I have yet to finish Fallout 4 or Fallout: New Vegas.

The sea change from "actual RPGs" to "shooters with occasional minor choices to make" enrages me.

that's not what based means

Am I the one that’s out of touch? No, it’s the almost half a million players who are mistaken!

This aligns with my experience of a very particular kind of game designer. I worked with one who, in a casual conversation about games where someone said "there's no wrong way to have fun," they responded with "yes there is, and it's my job to tell people what the right way is".

This is not a systemic issue, at Ubisoft or anywhere else. It's a particularity of a kind of person who is deeply drawn to games, but who also doesn't see other people as, well, people. It's a person who has made friends with games and game systems because they're incapable of being friends with, well, sapient beings.

Video game studio projects tend to have multiple designers working on them, with the creative director (or just "director") and lead designer working on large scale design things - genre, core loop, etc - and progressively less senior designers working on progressively smaller, progressively more soul crushing design work. Think things like item design and balance. Weirdly enough, the ones who think they're the arbiter of fun don't generally progress very high up this chain.

Not in team-based design environments, at least.

Personally, I just can't stand playing Larian Studio games. It's like playing with a vindictive DM. It was especially noticable in Divinity: OS2. I played as the skeleton guy who was permanently disguised. I'll encounter a random group of enemies.....and somehow, they just know to use heal on my undead guy to hurt him? He's disguised, what the fuck? Every enemy whether man, animal, or demon knew every weakness, knew which players had the lowest weaknesses, and would exploit the absolute fuck out of them. Exactly like a vindictive DM would.

You can't even pay to double the experience and money you get in game

"You mean this game doesnt have constant pop ups, a giant arrow, repetitive companion dialogue OR flashing UI elements constantly reminding me what to do? How will I even know where I'm going?"

Literally hundreds of thousands of players are proving him/her wrong as we speak.

"If you can't sync with location and see that damn bird fly around again, what the hell are you even doing with your life?"

I love turn based games. Not all of them, but a well made one is pretty sweet. I kinda stopped liking final fantasy at a certain point because it lost that

Octopath Traveler is one of my favorite games. I love retro style isometric turn based RPGs.

Do you think this person has ever gotten laid?

He just got frustrated because the tower got destroyed in the intro - how will he unlock the minimal now?

Reasoning like this is why they must work at Ubisoft. It's not like Ubisoft is known for their solid decision making.

this whole thing reads like " I don't like turn base games and this game sucks because it's turn based"

Do I misunderstood what based means or is this sarcasm?

Imagine their take on battlebit..

Is this a corporate flunky? That's not how you do 1337speak. 7 is a T, not an I. Memento Morti guess works? But the phrase is memento Mori.

In actual critique, Ubisoft has no ground to complain about others games after shitting out the same trash unto death.

There have also been a number of big publishers complaining about bg3. That this shouldn't be used as a metric for RPGs because its such an outlier and offers too much to be at profitable. Which is telling.

Someone feels threatened.

A take hotter than Karlach...

Someone's about to get burned

What re Ubisoft devs the saltiest in the business? Did they try and say the same shit about elden ring?