this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
14 points (93.8% liked)

Games

16370 readers
840 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, they went all in on Yasuke being a proven black samurai by getting in so called "experts" in the field. And now that they have been caught they play the "work of fiction" card. They don't care about Japanese fiction. All they care about is getting money and feeling good about themselves for having inclusion.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Inclusion at the cost of erasing a Japanese male character (from a game that takes place in Japan, hilariously), very inclusive indeed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't they sell a One Piece toy as an authentic replica katana for their merch? How do they justify that one

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

EDIT: Why do I feel like this is entirely lip service and Ubisoft is going to change nothing about the game? Also, I wonder how investors will see this announcement after Ubisoft lied and told them the game is universally praised?

Assassins Creed has NEVER had a real historical figure as a playable main character, EVER. But the one time they do, it has to be Yasuke?

"Yasuke as a samurai is a matter of debate"

No, it is not a matter of debate. There is only one letter that mentions him as a retainer. That's it. There is no evidence or proof or any mention of him being a samurai. There is no debate.

They clearly wrote part of this to try to salvage Lockleys career, but that guy already did the damage and deserves what has happened. You don't make up fan fiction and then pass it off as actual authentic historical fact.

This whole thing was obviously released to try to prevent the game being banned/limited/whatever by the Japanese government.

I hope they delay the game and fix all the issues it has, or rename it to Assassin's Creed Isekai and make the minor tweaks necessary for that.