108
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 72 points 1 week ago

It's the one with a dev that thinks that replacing "he" by "they" is political propaganda?

Yeah, no thanks.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can you provide some context?

Edit: I found the context. Here and here.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

maybe I'm not seeing where the smoking gun is, here. I see a guy saying something akin to "can we not do this here in the github please"

and then I see a bunch of people blowing up and yelling about "dehumanization" over it.

...why is this such a huge deal exactly?

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Absolutely nothing. The fact that they had to bring up a totally irrelevant 3 year old issue during an event that is supposed to be celebrated tells you a lot. They have been blatantly brigading various communities just for attention, and probably to get the dev cancelled or something. Even this post, the privacy community does not need this whole chain of replies. And yet, they overshadow every legit discussion with this bullshit unprompted.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

so I don't understand. why are all these comments yelling the same stuff? did they just decide to harass this one guy for saying "take it somewhere else, please"?

I'm trying to find anything malicious in anything he's said. I'm finding nothing but a dude working on a browser.

this kind of behavior scares me greatly. I know individuals who have been victims of real transphobia. this seems to be a simple language difference. and I think targeting this guy is a mistake.

Flooding and being loud doesn't make them right. it just means they're loud.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I’m trying to find anything malicious in anything he’s said

They use the "silence is violence" trope to harass and terrorize projects, hiding behind their "protected status" as a transgender. Whenever someone rejects anything that calls for "greater inclusion", they go nuclear and tell all their friends to do the same. The bullied becomes the bully. It's very childish. It's always people that never contribute any meaningful code as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Maybe I’m dumb, but I completely do not understand what the dev did to upset people.

I read the thread and I’m confused about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Can you provide some context?

This Mastodon post discusses it and has links to the PRs: https://ruby.social/@denis/112718132053579597

This one for SerenityOS shows Kling's response to a very minor and neutral change.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the heads up. Not worth the time

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] merde 16 points 1 week ago

for someone who can speak a language that lacks gendered pronouns, this "hysteria" over he/she/they is ridiculous!

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

As someone who speaks a language with gendered pronouns but no neutral option, this is very awkward to deal with.

[-] merde 7 points 1 week ago

yes, it's awkward for the "individual" who is longing for reliable expression

it also seems to be awkward for people who can't figure out the changes in the language they think as their own. They are irritated by their "disfigured" reflection

it's awkward for officials who need to make decisions (positive or negative) about the use of "inclusive" language

we give shape to languages and languages shape us

English could initially have neutral pronouns and people would be obliged to find other reasons to hate each other 🤷

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Well on the contrary you should understand it more. A gendered pronoun carries an idea of gender, and having a genderless pronoun frees the sentence of this gender assumption. Nothing very hard to understand.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (53 replies)
[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago

Is this browser private? Does it implement proper sandboxing and have any methods of anti-fingerprinting? I hope it eventually see the implementation of a robust content blocker. What makes this related to privacy and not instead just open source. While it is nice to see an independent web engine, if there is no method of anti-fingerprinting, the privacy of this browser is severely limited.

[-] Jumuta 7 points 1 week ago

oh yeah also js isn't very usable yet so that improves privacy

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

It isn't done yet. They are targeting 2026

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

My point exactly. It isn't ready and OP gave no context for why this relates to privacy. Better suited for the open source community on Lemmy.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

63.3K commits from 1K+ contributors and still pre-alpha, it's amazing what a nightmare web browsers have become!

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

servo.org: am I a joke to you?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

I think as more competition and choices we have, so better.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Dillo sobs lonely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Independent but then their coms are purely proprietary, US-based sludge. If you think folks should be contributing to your project, you should be using technology where you can where you & your contributors can patch & make better too. There is no good reason to be limited to only Microsoft Github & Discord.

Don’t get it wrong: I have followed for years & want the project to succeed, but this reliance on corporations & not giving your users a private option where they can control their data needs to stop. Normies have ignorance excuse but software makers do not as they generally know better about how these tech firms operate.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

That could be great! Alternative to firefox!

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

At least might help compete with Firefox to improve Foss browsers.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
108 points (76.7% liked)

Privacy

30011 readers
1346 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS