108
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 72 points 1 week ago

It's the one with a dev that thinks that replacing "he" by "they" is political propaganda?

Yeah, no thanks.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can you provide some context?

Edit: I found the context. Here and here.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

maybe I'm not seeing where the smoking gun is, here. I see a guy saying something akin to "can we not do this here in the github please"

and then I see a bunch of people blowing up and yelling about "dehumanization" over it.

...why is this such a huge deal exactly?

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Absolutely nothing. The fact that they had to bring up a totally irrelevant 3 year old issue during an event that is supposed to be celebrated tells you a lot. They have been blatantly brigading various communities just for attention, and probably to get the dev cancelled or something. Even this post, the privacy community does not need this whole chain of replies. And yet, they overshadow every legit discussion with this bullshit unprompted.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

so I don't understand. why are all these comments yelling the same stuff? did they just decide to harass this one guy for saying "take it somewhere else, please"?

I'm trying to find anything malicious in anything he's said. I'm finding nothing but a dude working on a browser.

this kind of behavior scares me greatly. I know individuals who have been victims of real transphobia. this seems to be a simple language difference. and I think targeting this guy is a mistake.

Flooding and being loud doesn't make them right. it just means they're loud.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I’m trying to find anything malicious in anything he’s said

They use the "silence is violence" trope to harass and terrorize projects, hiding behind their "protected status" as a transgender. Whenever someone rejects anything that calls for "greater inclusion", they go nuclear and tell all their friends to do the same. The bullied becomes the bully. It's very childish. It's always people that never contribute any meaningful code as well.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

edit omg I'm sorry I was replying to the wrong comment. they got me fucked up. lol

I'm with you. i see this a lot in the lgbt community and nobody calls them out on it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Open mindedness is a key factor for success (especially in open source). Inclusivity demonstrates open mindedness. The fact that the lead dev goes out of his way to prevent such a minor change (it's not even like people demanded a strict CoC or something) is a bad signal

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Changing "he" to "they" isn't a political change, or shouldn't be if you're not a fucking shithead

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Maybe I’m dumb, but I completely do not understand what the dev did to upset people.

I read the thread and I’m confused about it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

People get upset over anything tbh

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Can you provide some context?

This Mastodon post discusses it and has links to the PRs: https://ruby.social/@denis/112718132053579597

This one for SerenityOS shows Kling's response to a very minor and neutral change.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the heads up. Not worth the time

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] merde 16 points 1 week ago

for someone who can speak a language that lacks gendered pronouns, this "hysteria" over he/she/they is ridiculous!

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

As someone who speaks a language with gendered pronouns but no neutral option, this is very awkward to deal with.

[-] merde 7 points 1 week ago

yes, it's awkward for the "individual" who is longing for reliable expression

it also seems to be awkward for people who can't figure out the changes in the language they think as their own. They are irritated by their "disfigured" reflection

it's awkward for officials who need to make decisions (positive or negative) about the use of "inclusive" language

we give shape to languages and languages shape us

English could initially have neutral pronouns and people would be obliged to find other reasons to hate each other 🤷

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Well on the contrary you should understand it more. A gendered pronoun carries an idea of gender, and having a genderless pronoun frees the sentence of this gender assumption. Nothing very hard to understand.

[-] merde 3 points 1 week ago

that's what i thought i meant but thanks for the lesson I've never needed

even your comment is, for me, coming from that ridiculous tension

load more comments (53 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
108 points (76.7% liked)

Privacy

30011 readers
1378 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS