529
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A post that Mr. Trump circulated on Sunday called for Liz Cheney to be prosecuted by a military court reserved for enemy combatants and war criminals.

Included in the list of people to be brought up for war crimes against the United States were Current President Joe Biden, Current VP Kamala Harris, former VP Mike Pence, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Illinois Congressman Adam Kinzinger and Representatives Adam Schiff, Jamie Raskin, Pete Aguilar, Zoe Lofgren and Bennie Thompson.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 204 points 2 days ago

Punishment can include and is not limited to death.

I think there's a bit of a sobering moment that we have a Presidential candidate that is calling for specific names to be held to a firing squad.

[-] [email protected] 119 points 2 days ago

He tried to get Pence killed four years ago. We've known for at least that long that this is who Trump is. Republicans don't care.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

They do care. This is exactly what they want, a maniacal dictator who will kill all the "others" to implement a religious ethnostate

[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hey, they may be handing the country over to Fascism, but at least the people they hate will suffer!

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

Yes, my life may suck, but at least I’m not a woke gay pride critical gender theory non-white lefty lib that believes in human rights.

/sarcasm

It’s depressing because honestly I am just sad for the people that get into the conspiracies

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago

Donald: we need a Night of the Long Knives.

SCOTUS: let us open the kitchen drawer for you.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

The guy that avoided drafting, is Putin's bitch and said vetetans who died in the war were loosers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

The trump/Hitler comparison is becoming less ridiculous

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

It was never ridiculous, people just weren't able or willing to look into the future far enough. If someone said this would happen back in 2016 you'd be ridiculed.

And now look where we are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

Surely, surely, a significant portion of conservative voters can see that this isn't what democracy should look like, even if they're ardent republican supporters.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

republican allegiance is to the bible, not the constitution. they say a lot of things about the constitution, but in the end, they just want christo-fascism. some of them are true believers in the make believe, others just use to justify their own cruelty.

either way, their motives don't matter. it's all about what we're going to do about it.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

When your neighbor waves a loaded gun in your face, do you whine about how no neighbors should be behaving like that? Is that effective? That's basically begging for morality.

Stop preaching morality to your foes. The servatives are too far gone. The billionaires are too far gone.

No more hopium and copium.

We need to wake up to what IS, as opposed to what we wish it were.

If morality could solve any socioeconomic imbalance, billionaires would ban and outlaw morality.

The fact that morality is always promoted and no one went to prison or was assassinated for promoting morality means one of two things: either a) morality doesn't exist and can't work even in principle, and instead we have a bullshit narrative to make people more timid and more self-doubting to make from them more manageable subjects, or b) real actual morality does exist, and when taught WOULD threaten the billionaires and other exploiters, and thus WOULD effectively produce societies centered on broad wellbeing, but we were never exposed to it in religion or in any university level class.

If it's b) then such morality isn't based on begging and pleading with the unwilling and uninterested parties. And also if it's b) then preaching such morality would be viewed as a threat to today's trash status quo and a threat to the morbidly wealthy billionaires.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 96 points 2 days ago

Can we please just label the republican party a domestic terrorist organization already?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 49 points 2 days ago

He’s literally telling us what he’s going to do with a second term and we’re still not taking this asshat seriously. Like I said, we seem to be asleep at the wheel.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

just a bunch of cowards really

[-] [email protected] 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Biden and co will literally get hunted down by Trump's goons if he doesn't use his new powers to do what needs to be done

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Wow does he realize that by doing this he's basically making it self defence for Biden to anticipate him?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Maybe if he woke up enough to realize what's going on around him?

[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

Would be a reaaaal shame if someone interpreted this as a threat to the rule of law that necessitated some kind of presidential act. There's gotta be plenty of realistic ways to fuck with him in an official capacity.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Not doing it would be literally suicidal on Biden's part.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Can’t wait to see Biden take the “high road” and just sit back and let this play out and get himself executed. 🤦‍♀️

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Leaving unused options on the table then turning the country over to a fascist is a lot like being the guy who sits at the table with fascists and if Biden loses without trying something Im gonna call him that.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

This country went from undecided on the death penalty to openly embracing presidential hit squads seemingly over night. The right is saying who is on their list while the left is saying they should make one. Good times ahead.

[-] [email protected] 81 points 2 days ago

How bout we jail this insurrectionist for high crimes against the United States

[-] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago

No can do, high crimes aren't against the law.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 65 points 2 days ago

Even Hitler waited a little bit before making it clear he was going to purge

[-] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago

The more I think about trump saying that he could shoot someone in broad daylight in front of millions, and not lose a single supporter….. the more I think he was right.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Bone Spurs is 78 and grotesque.

He only has so much time, you dig?

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

His dad lived to 93. -_-

[-] [email protected] 58 points 2 days ago

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell,

Lol, the angry orange wants to punish the turtle man who covered for him. You pick the best allies there turtle boy!

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago

It would be schadenfreude to see Donald execute McConnell, but I wouldn't be able to really enjoy it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xmunk 59 points 2 days ago

Damn, Liz Cheney really lives rent free in that asshat's head.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago

Military tribunals? Sounds like some of his article 2 powers with absolute immunity now, their use cannot be questioned. Go to town Trump, say the conservatives on the supreme court.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago

Wonderful.

The delusional Q Anon 'secret military tribunals any day now' belief now stands a reasonable chance of actually happening.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Doubtful that the military would actually do that. Trump while President was reportedly annoyed at basically being told 'no' that General Kelly said that:

The President’s loud complaint to [then-White House chief of staff] John Kelly one day was typical: “You [f------] generals, why can’t you be like the German generals?”

“Which generals?” Kelly asked.

“The German generals in World War II,” Trump responded.

“You do know that they tried to kill Hitler three times and almost pulled it off?” Kelly said.

But, of course, Trump did not know that. “No, no, no, they were totally loyal to him,” the President replied.

The President may be Commander-in-Chief but the oath is to the Constitution. Obeying the President and officers are also a part of the oath but with the caveat that it is according to the regulations and UCMJ. You not only don't have to but you're taught to explicitly not follow an illegal order in the US military.

Not that US military members have given illegal orders that were followed but it is a little different to basically order the military to essentially start enforcing essentially a government coup for a politician against the US' own citizens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 52 points 2 days ago

Well I for one look forward to fleeing our upcoming dictatorship

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I really wish my wife had agreed to move to New Zealand back in 2016.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

You may want to check up on the news from New Zealand, things are getting rough there too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ArbitraryValue 43 points 2 days ago

Hah, I expect that Mitch McConnell is still going to vote for him.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago

Of course. So will Pence.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Liz Cheney is not an enemy combatant. If this is Trump's definition of one, that as an authoritarian any dissent to his will is considered treason, then he'll still need to change the rules of military tribunals to allow prosecution of non-combatant civilians. In case anyone hasn't read it, Wikipedia has a page on Military tribunals in the United States - Wikipedia

It's curious Trump seems to believe that mere political dissent equates to enemy combat and physical violence. Imagine what he must think about Jan 6 that he has been keeping to himself. Can anyone say "project"?

He's saying he must be given a military tribunal as an enemy combatant?

[-] marine_mustang 32 points 2 days ago

What, no Hillary Clinton? Is he trying to lose again?

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

We live in the worst time line.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
529 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18073 readers
4686 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS