they fumbled so hard. they could have had millions of new subscribers if they locked the api key under reddit premium and allowed 3rd party app to enter user api keys
50 a year isn't terrible depending on your use case, but they burned so much good will
Yup, Spez claims that $2/user/month is all they're asking. I'd have happily paid that direct to reddit if they'd been upfront from the get-go. Instead, I've deleted my account and left the site after a decade of contributions. Very sad to see it go, but I'm not going to be like those idiots whose still hanging around on twitter constantly complaining about the way it's managed
There are so many ways they could have made it viable. Like comically easy. But that was never what they were interested in. The thing that they aren't willing to just come out and say, is that their own app is built to generate advertising revenue. They have absolutely zero interest in fostering a 3rd party community, and the only concessions they are going to make are for things that actually have a chance at saving the spending money (i.e. make sure the free labor they get from moderators stays and make sure other people deal with questions like accessibility).
Can't shake the feeling it'll be a pump & dump. It would be truly poetic for Reddit to be pumped up with bot content, IPO, then dumped.
Absolutely. I probably would have paid. I'm not big on subscriptions as I prefer one time upfront costs or lifetime subscriptions when possible, but I did use Reddit a lot.
Instead I deleted my posts and moved on. Now, where do I find huskytantrums?!
Sometimes I think there isn’t much I miss from Reddit. And then someone mentions a community I miss. Gotta find me a new huskytantrums.
I don't know if I'd call it a fumble so much as a death march. They know what they're doing is wildly unpopular, they know they'll hemorrhage users, and they never change course. Full steam ahead with the Titanic.
that would've been such a good idea.
THIS. such a missed opp. idiots to the end.
This is what I was thinking. Heck, they could've increased the price of premium, locked the API behind it and keep a certain percentage of the third party apps' cut, similar to how the App Store runs.
They could've been greedy pigs and STILL won.
IMHO one of the biggest mistakes made early on in the development of the Internet is that everything should be free and ad supported. That is how we ended up social media that is destroying our socitey in the name of driving up engagement and thus ad revenue. I think things would have been much better if every one was just expected to pay a few bucks a month for the services they use.
I'll have to disagree. Products being paid wouldn't have stopped
the internet becoming centralized around fewer and fewer services
forced those services to have had upheld their quality and promises
Cable TV started under the pretense of having no ads other than each network's own, and to have access to pay-per-view events (which is sports and we can stop pretending sports didn't sell cable).
And yet Cable, despite exploding more and more on widespread adoption, still became the same if not WORSE than public TV.
The paid-ternet would be the same or worse than what we have. And I know Facebook's dream goal is to make a paid-ternet. If I die and become a cyberghost, I'll haunt the hell out of any server rack where that goal is making progress and make sure it never succeeeds.
I agree with you here. Share holders are never going to be satisfied. The numbers always need to be going up which means new ways to generate profits must be found. Ads, subs, micro transactions, etc - nothing is off the table.
Nobody "decided" that. Paid subscription services have been around just as long as ad support. The ad support model grew organically out of the converging desires of users to have unfettered access to content, and the desires of advertisers to have unfettered access to new monetization opportunities.
that's such a good idea, maybe I would've paid for that.
We’ll continue to be profit-driven until profits arrive. Unlike some of the 3P apps, we are not profitable.
Maybe fix your product before you expect the money to come pouring in.
wal-mart is profitable and they at least pay workers minimum wage. u/spaz can't make a profit when unpaid mods do most of the work for them. Not a very good CEO
That would require reddit to make good decisions, which they've repeatedly demonstrated is impossible
It's not impossible, they've just chosen not to. That says more than any AMA
Of course they're not profitable.
Most growing tech companies aren't, because most geowing tech companies will take their revenue and immediately reinvest it back into more growth, as they know growth attracts further VC investments, which will actually cover paychecks in the meantime. This is exactly how the world of tech works nowadays.
Being profitable or not is meaningless if you're talking about a company exploding in revenue.
If reddit "isn't profitable" why is spez worth over $10 million? That's not money you just stumble into having, and if your company "isn't profitable" wouldn't you not be making enough to be worth $10 million after only a decade? Wouldn't your money be going into keeping the lights on and not enriching yourself?
*billion
And profitability is not the same as generating revenue.
You can earn $200M a quarter and still have expenses of $220M, meaning you're making a net loss.
That's why companies focus on exponential growth first and don't really care about portability, but once the userbase is large enough, they will try to monetize it. Either through ads, or paid subscriptions, premium plans, special avatars, etc.
That will surely piss of some of the early adopters, but usually isn't significant enough to make an actual dent.
The last step (which we have also seen) is then kicking out staff. That has two effects:
1., It brings down the overhead (= salaries and attached taxes & social security) 2. The revenue per capita is inflated, i.e. it looks as if every employee is generating 4000 bucks instead of 2500 (random example), which is something that looks good in an IPO prospectus.
Steve Huffman continues to piss on Aaron Swartz's grave.
That was such a tiny violin moment from u/spez. Redditors are the ones making all the content. Their job is no more difficult than 3rd party apps for the most part
and unpaid mods moderating
All spez wants it to keep things going until the IPO where he gets paid big. He's doing these changes to appeal to IPO purchasers and "maximize" the value.
He just publicly admitted Reddit is not profitable and he’s mad that third party apps are. That IPO is not going to go well lol.
They would have to show their books as part of an IPO anyway, and everyone already knows its not profitable. It's not like he accidentally dropped a big secret here.
I keep reading this and I'm not 100% he is maximizing IPO value. I think he's ultimately doing more harm than good.
Yeah, honestly I can't see how good this can look from an investor perspective.
This will ultimately increase the number of users who can be advertised to.
For every person who is engaged about this there are a dozen that don't understand what an API is and will happily switch over to another app from the app store if it has cat gifs.
There were 3 things going for Reddit, content wise: memes, news, hobby subs. It was a 50/50 if my Google search included reddit or Wikipedia. If reddit threw up a banner every 6 months and asked for a donation, I'd gladly throw 20 bucks their way. Reddit should have been a non-profit.
Going public was the absolute worse decision they ever made.
I used to buy a pretty good amount of gold before they let in actual fascists and then downplayed their toxic impact on the community and the internet in general.
Agreed, I don't know why Reddit is pushing to go public. Personally I don't see the value in a business that admits that they aren't profitable, but that raises the question if they aren't making money how as Reddit operated for so long? The upside to them going public is that they'll have to start publishing financial statements and we'll get to just how much money the "unprofitable" business is making.
He's just digging the grave more and more...
Is there any social media company that is profitable? Facebook is an advertising platform with a side-hustle as a social media site. Other than that, Twitter was losing money and since Elon is losing much more, Reddit is losing money, Discord is losing money, Snapchat is losing money.
Social media is an advertising platform. YouTube is a form of social media that's profitable too, at least now, and it's all from ads.
YouTube is Google. Google and Facebook are advertising companies who have side hustles doing other things like showing videos. So far, nobody else has managed to do that. Is it possible another ad company with a social side-hustle could emerge? Sure, but Facebook and Google are going to do whatever they can to either buy up or destroy any company that got too successful at that.
Moar ads!
We're going to be profitable by completely decimating our product.
No, wait. That doesn't seem like the right thing to do!
The beatings will continue until ~~morale~~ profit improves
If I delete my account, how will I use it to sabotage reddit?
Spez has a very punchable face, if I ever saw one.
It’s insane to me that a site with as much activity and engagement as Reddit is allegedly “not profitable”. He’s either flat-out lying or they have mismanaged the site to a legendary degree.
Either way, it’s pretty pathetic.
This seems typical for dot com/social/next best thing. They grow at all cost in angel funding. Then cash out.
IPO'ing an unprofitable company in the current economy is a pretty ballsy move. More power to them I guess...
