Politics

357 readers

13 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kersploosh

pelespirit

Anti CBDC bill passes the US House (www.congress.gov)

submitted 6 months ago by Estiar to c/politics

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This bill has just passed the US House of Representatives. Why is this important?

Today, we have Visa and Mastercard as our choice of digital payment. Some have floated crypto as an alternate, but crypto is complicated and not backed by an economy or central bank. Others have floated the idea of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) that matches the availability of Mastercard and Visa, but do not go through their services. It could also be used offline with smart devices.

Some critics have cited concerns over privacy, where the central government could collect information, while others have pointed out that Visa and Mastercard collect that sort of data anyways, and CBDCs might log less data if designed differently.

The point may soon become moot if the bill passes the Senate and receive the president's signature

My take on this bill is that it's a ban that should not be put into place. CBDC can still be issued to banks though, just not for you and me. It keeps Credit card companies able to charge high merchant fees.

If I were to write a bill on CBDC, I would put in privacy restrictions into the bill, but still allow for individual CBDC to be issued.

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

To me, if we saw a CBDC it would be important that the government is not able to prevent anyone from transacting with someone else, or to track who is giving money to who.

I imagine such a law would be dead on arrival, so kind of a moot point. But I would argue any CBDC should function like cash - fungible, not tracked (except in cases where they have to use old fashioned detective work)

[–] Titou 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

and not backed by an economy or central bank

Yeah, that's the point of using cryptos like Monero

[–] Estiar 1 points 6 months ago

There's a big difference between the two though. Usually in the US, we have transactions in dollars. Whether by credit cards or cash.

With crypto, you have to go to an exchange, and set up payment devices. Then the other person would have to set up that too. Monero trades availability for privacy and sanctions relief

A CBDC wouldn't really compete with Monero. It would compete with things like PayPal where it's still in dollars.