this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
621 points (92.0% liked)

Technology

59708 readers
2105 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 195 points 6 months ago (11 children)
[–] gravitas_deficiency 65 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I’d just like to make the point that that is not normal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 167 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)

the explosion, which took place at its Boca Chica Starbase facilities

The raptor testing stand at McGregor experienced an anomaly

Well, which is it? I'm going to trust NASASpaceflight over this article and go with it was a McGregor. No where near Starbase. And that means it will likely have no effect on IFT4 as this article says.

edit: Adding to this, the author of this article has no idea what they are talking about.

The Raptor engines that are currently undergoing testing are SpaceX’s Raptor 2 engines

So clearly nothing to do with IFT4, as Ship 29 and Booster 11 are already outfitted with their engines, non of which are Raptor 2s.

On its last flight test, IFT-3, Starship finally reached orbital velocity and it soared around Earth before crashing down into the Indian Ocean. On the next flight, SpaceX aims to perform a reentry burn, allowing Starship to perform a soft landing in the ocean.

IFT3 burned up on reentry, maybe parts of it made it to the ocean, but it was not crashing into the ocean that was the problem. IFT4 does not plan on doing a reentry burn. No one does a reentry burn from orbit. Starship uses a heat shield like every other orbital space craft. They are planning to attempt a landing burn, that is probably what they are talking about.

[–] Quacksalber 75 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It waw McGregor. And while the explosion was spectacular, it happened on the test stand, so not much damage was done actually.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah anyone following space YouTube has seen this a dozen times already and knows that it was a deflagration likely due to busted lines and not a detonation. The test stand is likely undamaged (In anysignificant way at least) and it was just an engine test of likely raptor 2 design. This has nothing to do with IFT4 or starbase as far as we can tell.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 112 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (15 children)

Okay? It was on a test stand. That's what test stands are for. Isn't stuff like this almost a weekly occurrence for them?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I imagine they don't necessarily always fail explosively. I don't know how often this stuff actually happens.

[–] JohnDClay 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

A year or two ago they were blowing one up every month or so. They've become more rare recently as they've dialed in the engines.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 6 months ago

Remember when the FAA investigated SpaceX's violation of it's launch license over them ignoring warnings of worsening shockwave damage after their botched SN8 landing?

Pepperidge Farms Remembers.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 6 months ago (13 children)

Good lord, everyone please learn a tiny bit about spacex and the state of the space industry instead of letting your (justified) hatred of Elon do the typing.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I dont see whynanyone's surprised, anything Elon is touchung is tainted by association. It's not rocket science.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago (5 children)

You're right, Elon Musk being associated with a company is negative. And what SpaceX has accomplished despite that association is truly impressive.

I think around here most people agree that billionaires don't earn their billions, they reach that point having benefited from the efforts of thousands of workers. So why don't we recognize those people's work? Somehow, SpaceX has managed to avoid the meddling that we see from Musk in relation to Twitter and Tesla.

Before SpaceX the U.S. was reliant on Russia's soyuz to get us to and from the space station. We didn't have anything that could launch people into orbit.

Before SpaceX we were launching single use rockets built by companies like United Launch Alliance (ULA), which was founded as a joint venture between defense contractors Lockheed Martin and Boeing. (They're still around and still for the most part suck)

And before SpaceX the cost to do anything in space was extremely prohibitive. NASA didn't and still doesn't really build their own rockets, they contract out, and the contracts had been cost-plus, meaning ULA got an agreed on profit plus expenses. So if the schedule slipped on development or development cost more than expected, they actually make more money. There wasn't much of a private market in space.

With SpaceX they created re-usable rocket components, re-established a U.S. sourced crew capsule, and using fixed price contracts they reduced the cost of launch by an order of magnitude. And by publishing fixed prices to get into space, they pretty much by themselves kicked off the private space economy. SpaceX launches more frequently than any other company, and more than any nation.

And they did all that with a better safety record than previous programs! I can't speak to this particular explosion, but SpaceX has taken an approach where they create new designs quickly, and test them quickly with the potential for explosions, before they put humans at risk on a live launch.

Elon Musk didn't do all that, the people at SpaceX did. And if anything I'm concerned about the point when he gets tired of fucking up twitter and tesla and turns his attention to SpaceX. I'm hoping the national security aspect of the company will mean responsible adults prevent him from interfering.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Well, this is rocket science.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (9 children)

I’d have a lot more sympathy for this comment if people would actually do this in reference to Space Billionaires. I’ve had far too many conversations online and elsewhere where the individual shits on NASA for space industry problems and worships Space Billionaires because [some convoluted “government bad rich entrepreneurs good” reason] and their problems aren’t really problems. I’m not saying you’re part of the billionaire sycophant club, but I’m not against musk’s well deserved criticism as he sacrifices people in his rush, and probably work quality suffers alongside them.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Does anyone else think the thumbnail looks like a llama with laser eyes?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That killllls peeeeople

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago (4 children)

A few years ago (already) I would have been sad and shocked. Now I don't give a shit about SpaceTwitter. That douchebag managed to kill all the interest I had for space exploration, a topic I was passionate about for most of my life. He really is that kind of killjoy.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 6 months ago (14 children)

Why would you let that ruin all of space exploration for you? He's a dick. I don't give a crap about his company. But exploring the solar system is still absolutely amazing.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The people on lemmy are college kid level extremist on literally everything and it would be funnier if it weren't so exhausting.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (9 children)

NASA successfully launched Artemis 1 first try.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Maybe someone called it cisgendered.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Bruh its a TEST STAND TEST STAND this is not the Frist time a engine exploded on a test stand raptor engines in their development phase are supposed to explode. Elon musk has said if something doesn't explode then you did something wrong

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

Well, if Musk said it, it must be true. /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Hope everyone was okay, the article doesn’t talk about injuries.

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer 24 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Personnel are evacuated from McGregor whenever a test is to be performed, just like they are with Starbase.

There is absolutely zero chance anyone got hurt. This isn't Boeing.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

Can someone please cue up the Boeing hit men?

load more comments
view more: next ›