this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
416 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

37961 readers
109 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 177 points 1 year ago (2 children)

https://www.statista.com/statistics/513049/alphabet-annual-global-income/

Let's pause a moment and just appreciate how much money Alphabet actually make net (after expenses). $73,795,000,000 last year - higher than the GDP of entire nations, in profit.

The "bad" year, 2022 that drove all this change, they only made $59,972,000,000 net. Oh how terrible (!)

5 years ago, they made $34,343,000,000 net, so they've more than doubled profits.

Take a moment to appreciate that, and really consider if they "need" the money.

[–] [email protected] 111 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Shareholders: you doubled your profit last year, so I expect you to do it again this year.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

*we expect you to do better than that

There, fify

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the whole company. How much did YouTube lose for them?

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (7 children)

YouTube lost google -31.5 billion in 2023, approximately 10% of all of alphabet's revenue.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was genuinely confused by this statistic until I realised it was a double negative. YouTube losen't Google a lot of money.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Yeah, sorry, sometimes I can't help my need to play with language, when given the slightest chance.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 year ago (48 children)

I'll give up on YouTube before I give up my ad blocks or 3rd party apps. Fuck off Google.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That's likely what they want. If you're not viewing their ads and your third-party app is even blocking all the tracking, then you are not providing any value to them to keep you as a 'customer'. All it does is reduce their hosting and serving costs when you're blocked or when you eventually stop using it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)
[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 year ago (19 children)

It's funny how this comes after Chrome's switch to Manifest V3, which makes ad blocking not possible on Chrome and was purely for security reasons and not for disabling ad blockers. Now that Chrome users can't block ads on the first-party site, they're going after third-party clients. Such coincidental timing.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

"security reasons" is the classic cop-out for making users lives more miserable.

Like what are you gonna do, argue that you don't care about security?

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Are they going to officially allow third party apps at all? The stock app is terrible, and not just because of excessive, unskippable advertising and bizarre restrictions around background play. When you search for anything, at least half of the results are completely unrelated to what you searched for in an attempt to increase user engagement metrics. It keeps trying to get you to watch shorts in its bad TikTok clone. Sometimes it recommends unrelated shorts with disturbing thumbnails in the middle of your search results. It keeps autodetecting that the video quality should be 360p on a connection easily capable of 4k, and resetting back to 360p at the start of every new video. The UI for live streams puts things on top of other things that are more important.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And all of those come down to money

Search shows you random videos because “the algorithm” is hoping to drive you through to videos that are the most monetized and the most likely to keep you on the platform based on their data

The shorts thing is because they can pack more ads into 15 second bits of content while using less bandwidth and they’re hoping to hijack your attention with an “endless stream” of short clips a la TikTok or instagram reels

The video bandwidth drops to low every time because they’re hoping people will still watch, see the ads, and not bump the quality up, saving Google on bandwidth costs

The live streams thing is just more advertising revenue again

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

As soon as I have to see shorts, YouTube is dead to me. I hate the format with a passion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Please download and archive your favorite channels and videos!

Host them yourself to watch them locally.

Especially do this for educational material, share it wide and far!

We are entering a very dark age of techno-dystopia, we need to fight it with everything we have. Pirate, seed, screen-record, download, archive, share, never give up.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Quick shout out to yt-dlp. It comes everything you need to download, transcode, and even use Sponsorblock!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago

Not again ... Well, let's wait a week or so for the clients to fix that.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Third party apps: "OK. We'll show ads. Muted. Behind a black overlay. If we really can't find a workaround."

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (14 children)

They've been trying for a minute. Must be different now that they're saying it!

Checks notes

Nope, revanced still works.

[–] Patches 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We are officially ON NOTICE

Soon be Blasted, Slammed, Potentially even Yeeted

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta love this shit. Conservatives/companies: "Let the market decide!" The market: "We are tired of you cramming ads down our throats and fundamentally do not want it and will actively fight you on it." Companies: "Waaaaaa, they are fighting us."

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Conservative companies promoting free market economy: Government, make it a crime to not use our products!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've mostly only noticed that the comments won't load, not a big loss imo

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As soon as 3rd party clients don't work as they do anymore, I am stopping going to YouTube. Simple as, I know it doesn't matter as a singular thing, I am just one user. Was the same with reddit, now I am here but reddit is still going (how well we don't need to debate now).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I've been using youtube on Firefox with ublock since the premium price raise. Even on android. The experience is not great, but that makes sure I don't have ads at all.

Also discovered unhooked addon yesterday. Is desktop only, but great for going into less youtube rabbit holes that waste my time.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Youtube isn't some one of a kind miracle. There's at least a dozen already-established streaming platforms that would take its place. There are thousands of websites that have no problems hosting gigs and gigs of porn, so it's not as difficult as people think.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fuck them. I'd rather donate quadruple the money for premium to my favourite creators directly than give a single penny to this parasitic mega corporation.

The issue is not only the ads, it's the stupid shit it throws you to keep you hooked, it's the stupid shorts that literally no one asked for, it's every stupid little thing that fights for your attention. Basically the app doesn't work for you, it works against you. That's not the case with third party apps, they have you, the user, in mind, not their profits.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, huge shout out to the wave of enshittification crashing through Google and reddit and forcing me off their platforms. Decade-long debilitating addiction solved.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'll just use Firefox mobile with uBlock Origin then, literally anything is better than ads

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Damn, I got my setup so perfect on the TV with SmartTube. But I will not be able to tolerate ads. Then I'd rather only watch on Firefox with uBlock on my laptop.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Hey Google, FUCK YOU.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, third party clients will rectify the issue.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I’ve Invidious hosted on my Little Raspberry Pi 4, and using it’s WPA app on every device I got.

Zero ad + Decent UI + Access to highest video quality

https://invidious.io/

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

I personally have no problem with paying for a service. However, if I buy premium to remove the ads, YT has no longer the need to collect my data. But it is Google and they won't stop collecting. That, plus the fact that Google basically has a monopoly with youtube are the reasons I don't buy premium.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Peertube is planning on releasing an official app this year. Just thought I'd throw that out there.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›