this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
152 points (98.1% liked)

BrainWorms

1165 readers
28 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 159 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Payment providers should not be able to control what users are or are not allowed to purchase with their cards. It's a downward spiral. Electronic payment is a necessity in nowadays life.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As long as it's a legal transaction, the providers should STFU.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In many states, and federally, marijuana sales aren't legal transactions, and that's the point. I don't think Mastercard is necessarily doing anything wrong here, they're just covering their asses. This one is on our politicians who are still dragging their heels on legalizing marijuana.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Sets a precedent though, and implies that the card companies are responsible for what people buy. First it’s drugs, then it’s porn, liquor, gender affirming items and hormones, contraceptives, or whatever else the fascists don’t like. Companies won’t want to be fined by the fascist right once they start pushing to ban things.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll never use Mastercard out of principle after this. Fuck them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You do realize that there are no banks in the United States that will allow marijuana related business to work with them either, right?

It's highly illegal under federal law. My business is done business with marijuana related businesses in the past, and they all have to operate with cash and hand only. It's insane.

Nothing like carrying a suitcase full of $250,000 in small sequential unmarked bills to the bank you know...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

fyi slight bone apple tea there

it’s cash in hand

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago

Payment processors have a functional monopoly and should not be permitted to refuse or otherwise be punitive to any category of purchase.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is lame. Mastercard telling people what not to by is outrageous but not the first time they've done this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What else have they done? I had no idea this was even legal.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

they did it with pornhub at least

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Onlyfans too

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Well, they can't stop a cash withdrawal on your card to pay for it. So, it appears they still have to pay for it in a way.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Cannabis users should move to ban Mastercard.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's a very dumb business move, it might be illegal for then to do that in Canada

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It should be illegal for a company to limit what you can purchase anywhere in the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's nothing illegal about them blocking illegal purchases on their cards, of which the US federal government still considera marijuana illegal

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Re read my comment

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I only skimmed the article but it seemed US centric so I'd guess this is relevant to the US since it's not legal federally there. I was worried for a moment since I use one for my orders in Canada. Though if for some reason does happen in Canada I'm sure there'll still be some way to do online orders like with Interac or another company. Too much tax money collected for the Canadian government to just let an online revenue stream dry up from a credit lender.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

This was a maneuver by VISA and MC in the Aughts when Wikileaks was publishing information embarrassing to the US Federal Government.

Pharmacies and medical doctors have long been creative about preserving privacy. Dispensaries will go back to selling tea or candy or miscellaneous OTC pharmacological product which they've been doing since prohibition if not before.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From the article: "The federal government considers cannabis sales illegal, so these purchases are not allowed on our systems," the spokesperson added.

Seems like this isn’t a Mastercard thing, but a government thing. Marijuana is still illegal at the inter-state level unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is exactly it, and everyone crowing about "credit card companies shouldn't be able to restrict what you can buy" didn't read the article. Mastercard doesn't want to restrict people from buying things they are legally allowed to buy, because more Mastercard transactions = more money for them. But they have to follow the laws, and being complicit in illegal purchases puts them at risk for litigation.

No point in getting mad at Mastercard for this. Get angry at our politicians who still haven't legalized marijuana. If marijuana is legalized federally, and sales of marijuana are legalized federally, I guarantee you MC will lift this ban in a heartbeat so they can get a piece of that pie. Cannabis is a cash cow.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that hasnt been being enforced for a long time, so if something's changed it'd help Mastercard's PR quite a bit to point to a government order or something.

Otherwise yeah it's a mastercard thing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's still a non-trivial legal liability that any major company would prefer to not have.

If you could spend $1 to eliminate a 1% chance that you're going to be arrested, you're probably gonna take it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

You'll not stop me! I'll just withdraw money from an ATM, and what I do with that is nacho business.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

And over here in Sweden we're 99% cash-less at the moment. I tried to warn as many as possible that we do not want to give up transactional independence.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Ok, I’ll just switch, they already ban porn purchases 👍

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I didn't even think you were allowed to use debit cards or credit cards to buy weed.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›