this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
152 points (98.1% liked)

BrainWorms

1165 readers
27 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 159 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Payment providers should not be able to control what users are or are not allowed to purchase with their cards. It's a downward spiral. Electronic payment is a necessity in nowadays life.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As long as it's a legal transaction, the providers should STFU.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In many states, and federally, marijuana sales aren't legal transactions, and that's the point. I don't think Mastercard is necessarily doing anything wrong here, they're just covering their asses. This one is on our politicians who are still dragging their heels on legalizing marijuana.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sets a precedent though, and implies that the card companies are responsible for what people buy. First it’s drugs, then it’s porn, liquor, gender affirming items and hormones, contraceptives, or whatever else the fascists don’t like. Companies won’t want to be fined by the fascist right once they start pushing to ban things.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mastercard is adhering to federal laws, not taking a moral stand. Credit card companies aren't obligated to facilitate illegal transactions. If they were banning something whose sale was completely legal, there would be a argument to be made here, but that's not what's happening. They aren't going to go after porn, liquor, gender affirming items, hormones, or contraceptives, unless some fascists ban them, at which point it's not the credit card companies restricting you, it's the fascists. Go after the fascists.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What federal law are they adhering to? Mastercard isn’t buying the drugs they are denying a person access to the funds that that person already owns. Mastercard should be agnostic to what the person uses that money for.

It sets a precedent that card companies are responsible for what their client’s purchase, and can reject transactions based on what their clients are purchasing, not how much money/credit they have.

I can go after corporate shitheads and fascists especially when they are holding each other’s cocks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The fact that marijuana is still federally classified as a Schedule I drug. Why would you think credit card companies should allow cardholders to make illegal transactions using their credit cards? Do you think they'd be okay with people using their credit cards to purchase child pornography? Or hitmen? Trafficked persons? What about 100 kilos of cocaine? I'm aware marijuana isn't as bad as any of those things, and it's way past time for the laws to be updated, but the fact remains it's still against the law to purchase it. To argue they have no obligation to make sure they aren't facilitating in illegal actions is absurd. As far as I know they've never allowed illegal transactions to be made, so absolutely no precedent is being set here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Why should I care what a person is buying? So what if they are buying hitmen or 100 kilos of cocaine? If and when they get caught they will go to prison. It’s not Mastercard’s job to police the system.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll never use Mastercard out of principle after this. Fuck them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You do realize that there are no banks in the United States that will allow marijuana related business to work with them either, right?

It's highly illegal under federal law. My business is done business with marijuana related businesses in the past, and they all have to operate with cash and hand only. It's insane.

Nothing like carrying a suitcase full of $250,000 in small sequential unmarked bills to the bank you know...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

fyi slight bone apple tea there

it’s cash in hand