this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
275 points (88.5% liked)

US Authoritarianism

952 readers
115 users here now

ChonkyOwlbear is an Illegitimate Usurper

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

This will have been drawn from the work of Erin Reed Though its worth noting her only firm, DO NOT TRAVEL, so far, is florida. Though the rest are of course still dangerous.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This has been the map of places I'm willing to travel since the 80's... I guess not much has progressed

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'd say most places in PA aren't very trans friendly. It might be better in Pittsburgh,Harrisburg and Philly. But pretty much everywhere else is a bunch of redneck pennsyltuckyians

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Might as well slice California into just the bay and LA/SD too. In the North state a lot of it is very backwoodsy folk.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Welcome fellow pennsyltyuckian.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

But lots of states have safe trains and railroads, there aren't that many crashes or derailments of passanger trains.

Joking aside, has anyone heard of The Green Book?

Compiled by Victor Hugo Green (1892–1960), a Black postman who lived in the Harlem section of New York City, the Green Book listed a variety of businesses—from restaurants and hotels to beauty salons and drugstores—that were necessary to make travel comfortable and safe for African Americans in the period before the passage of the 1964 civil rights act.

Maybe something similar could be done for traveling modern America?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] rambling_lunatic 2 points 10 months ago

I have.

https://onlysky.media/ccassidy/the-good-old-days-refuted-by-a-single-book/

This article makes a glorious point. If I ever move to the US I'm gonna buy this book and carry it around any time I expect to argue with a certain kind of red-hatted folk.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

I'm cisheterowhitedude and I hate going to backwoods places. It's not that I'm in danger, I just don't want to deal with chuds or pay any money that might support them in any way. So I stick to this map also

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As someone FROM AZ their has been a lot of positive change for LGBQT communities, but I would not recommend being out as Trans in public other than known safe spaces. Would love to hear from someone who is still there to tell me I am wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Really depends. It's a big state lol. Anywhere in Tucson or Flagstaff? Safe as safe can be. The valley is a mixed bag based on which part you're in but generally okay. Anywhere rural is also gonna be pretty hit-or-miss, but for the love of all that you hold dear do not go into The Mojave, Idc how much someone loves Fallout.

[–] sanpedropeddler 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All of them are "relatively" safe. As in, its better than the vast majority of the world. Its still not great though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ohio is mixed. The cities are safe except when occupied by the fascist paramilitary groups like the proud boys. The rural areas are dangerousish

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That can be said of many states. Is Illinois actually that welcoming outside of Chicago?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Fair, I think the big thing is about the state laws

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Yes, it’s the Catholicism

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Chicagoland welcomes you. Don't go downstate though. The further south you go the more Kentucky it gets.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You didn't have to do NH like that

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Having been there, it's better this way. Truly the armpit of New England.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

It's the South of the North

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What's happening to trans people in the other states?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

not much change on a day to day basis, but its huge in terms of codifying the brutal arrests that are already common throughout the US. But Yes, increased risk of frivolous arrest, extrajudicial violence, democide. 'A reinstitution of republican principles',. not sure how else to say...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/24-of-transgender-adults-report-access

It was never about "grooming", or protecting the kids, or women's sports. If it was, they wouldn't need to lie in their propaganda.

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/delete-this-mistaken-victory-claims

There are organized groups in this country that want trans people to disappear, and if that means making life so intolerable that suicides happen and removing healthcare mandatory for well-being, well. Can't make an omelette without cracking a few eggs, right?

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/ohio-michigan-republicans-in-released

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm not trans, so I can't speak with full certainty here. But places I've lived and visited in the South, generally I wouldn't label as outright dangerous. From what I've heard and seen, it's probably more dangerous to be black in those parts, as some places in GA for example still have sundown towns.

I've met a number of trans people here who don't remark notably about safety any more than the typical "I have to be careful going out at night cause I'm not able to defend myself" which is not representative of all the LGBTQ folk I met of course and would apply equally to a smol gal.

So while I don't want to discredit you, I really don't think this notion that you've been led to believe holds any water at least from my experience which is admittedly likely not worth much.

But now I'm curious whether the LGBTQ population is by chance more concentrated in these "safe" states? That seems like a more enlightening metric on its own, actually knowing a demographical metric rather than getting just an ominous "avoid everywhere but here"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

I would never pee in West Virginia outside of a private residence. In my home state of Ohio I’m uncomfortable being in certain parts of the state unless I’m with cis people or driving through.

Safety is a relative term. There are certain areas people avoid, maybe it’s a bad part of town. I avoid certain parts of my state as the bad parts of my state because hate crimes go unpunished there because what flies in hocking hills doesn’t in Cincinnati and vice versa.

Also I avoid the proud boys when they match with guns unless I’m part of an organized anti fascist group that’s there for them.

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Until proven otherwise, I'm now under the notion that this map actually represents the authors "places I would care to go"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

I linked the source. It’s just a map of places that havent instituted any anti-trans laws in the last three years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What happened in New Hampshire?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

NH is the south of the northeast.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That's rough