this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
168 points (94.2% liked)

politics

18645 readers
5250 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Clout learns there’s been some serious turnover in Sen. John Fetterman’s office. In the last month, all three of Fetterman’s top communications staffers have left Capitol Hill.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 131 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Fetterman wouldn't stop talking about how only progressives could save America and how he was a progressive...

Then he had his stroke and suddenly he'd get belligerently angry anytime someone called him a progressive.

Either he was lying to get elected, or he had the relatively common stroke side effects of a personality change.

Either way, it makes sense all his staffers and donors are running from him. Dudes a fucking joke these days.

[–] [email protected] 101 points 4 months ago

At least he spared us from Oz becoming a senator. Even with the personality change, he isn't nearly as bad as that grifter. Now hopefully someone can primary him when his seat is available, or better yet maybe someone can convince him to step aside since he's no longer the person he used to be.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The stroke may well have been part of it, but he honestly told us who he was when he pulled a shotgun on an unarmed Black man out for a jog, all because he thought he’d heard gunshots and assumed the man was running away.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So in psychology they break racism down into implicit and explicit. Basically subconscious and conscious racism.

The subconscious is about how you determine your in group as a toddler. So being around other races prevents it from forming along racial lines, but even seeing them on TV helps.

Grow up in a homogenous environment tho, it'll form along racial lines.

To prevent explicit racism, you have to use critical thinking, but in situations like you're example, someone reacts fast and those implicit biases against other races presents.

A stroke can damage the part of your brain that does that critical thinking, and suddenly someone "becomes" racist.

The details are important because we have zero control of what we're exposed to during our formulative years. It's literally out of our hands. And while we can over ride those biases most of our lives, even just normal aging makes them more pronounced.

But like, that shit where people kept blaming racist shit they said/did on popping an Ativan and staying awake on Twitter?

That has a valid scientific reason for making them say things they legit never would have normally.

Acting like implicit/explicit racism is the same just confuses those older people who are legit "from a different time" and is why they make such a big deal about how they're being persecuted.

It's terrible they're racist, but it's literally because they're losing important brain functions. I spent a couple years working with people with intellectual disabilities, they don't respond well to being yelled at, but if you break stuff down so they understand what's happening, everyone is better.

So, yeah.

Fetterman likely has always had implicit biases, but this isn't "mask off" this is a man who may no longer be capable of recognizing things on a deeper level than "you don't look like my tribe, you're dangerous".

Which for most of human evolution, was a big deal.

We just need to ensure future generations don't view their tribe as only people of the same race so this stops happening to them when they age or get fucked up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

So, the stroke turned him more Republican?

[–] Ashyr 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What’s he done? I was a fan from a distance during his campaign.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ashyr 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is it the stroke? This seems insane.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

A stroke can affect many things that get chalked up to "personality change".

We think of ourselves as a single entity, but really what's make us "us" is a collection of a whole bunch of things and changing some of them can change the overall result.

So I think it's the stroke.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is who he always was.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

I knew I shouldn't have trusted someone from York county

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They probably aren't fans of Israel's genocide in Gaza.

EDIT: Looks like @Pogogunner is pro-genocide.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

I used to think he seemed cool because I knew nothing about him. Fuck him. Fuck Israel.