Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
It was a Democrat caught stating the obvious, not a Republican caught admitting the obvious.
Anyone else feel like the article really didn't want to mention that part?
Honestly, I wish more news sites would refrain from naming party affiliation. It forces people to think of the content of the statements first.
Content is lost without context.
"Eat your dick" means something very different if you're sitting in front of a pudding.
Or in front of a guy named Richard.
Wait that kinda got a way from me, I can't tell if I made a sex or cannibalism joke
What if I told you it's an inclusive or.
Was it a democratic though?? I don't think it was. It mentions a conversation from someone to a democrat, but with no context as to why. Then says "it's unclear who" actually had the hot mic.
Anyway, it's a garbage article. Although the headline of the article and this post are different too so that may have thrown us off.
Yes, It was Dan Goldman. it’s in the article and the excerpt OP posted above.
Your MAGATS Were So Preoccupied With Whether Or Not They Could, They Didn't Stop To Think If They Should
Pshaw, the voters might just be ignorant idiots, buy most of the law makers know full well how dumb this sort of bullshit is - there's a long tradition of this sort of buffonery that predates maga... The Benghazi hearings was an absolute clown show.
Granted, there are a few lawmakers that seem to have genuinely drunk the kool-aid and those fucks are scary.
The clip is just chaos, lol. People milling about, clerk's not present to take a vote, and papers thrown everywhere lol. These idiots couldn't run a popsicle stand.
Of course not, everyone knows that the Dems have the best popsicle flavors
This is the best summary I could come up with:
An apparently frustrated GOP-led committee heard testimony from a variety of witnesses who have more or less confirmed their so-far failed efforts to support evidence of any corruption.
Rep James Comer, the committee chair, told Dan Goldman, a Democrat on the panel, that he was “out of order,” banged his gavel, and said, “We are in suspension here until the clerk comes so we can take the vote that your side of the aisle requested.”
Earlier in the day, Massachusetts Democratic Rep Stephen Lynch, a decades-long member of the Oversight Committee, told Republicans that so far, “You’ve actually provided more evidence to impeach Donald Trump for a third time than you have in so much as laying a glove on Joe Biden.”
Earlier this month, Mr Comer invited Hunter Biden and his associates to testify before the committee.
Former Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas also testified, saying he was “witness to numerous efforts to prove that Joe and Hunter Biden were linked to corruption in Ukraine.” Mr Parnas said that after travelling around the world for a year — as he was tasked to do by Mr Giuliani — he found “precisely zero evidence of the Bidens’ corruption in Ukraine.”
Last month, the arrest of FBI informant Alexander Smirnov poked a sizeable hole in the Republicans’ impeachment inquiry.
The original article contains 377 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 42%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!