I'm going to assume they had somebody go out to the properties he tried to put up as collateral for the bonds and they assessed a much lower value than what trump is insisting it's worth. In short his properties aren't worth enough to cover it.
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
134 points (96.5% liked)
politics
18651 readers
3782 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm assuming they also required financials for these properties that show any mortgages or liens that are already attached to them. There is no way they would accept collateral that already has liabilities against them because they would not be able to seize them outright, and if a sale was forced that caused the property to sell for way below market value they might not recoup their funds. I see no way that any major financial institution is going to risk a half a billion dollars on Trump's behalf without a 100% guaranteed return on investment.
That too.
Also, “it’s just business”… seems kind of reasonable now.
Though I wouldn’t want trumps left over properties. You’ll never get the greasy shit stains out. Or the smell.
Edit: it occurs to me that one strategy rich fucks use for “earning” a living and avoiding cap gains taxes is taking loans using their assets as collateral- with real estate, taking extra mortgages out and using their rent income to pay interest.
So chances are solid most of, if not all of his properties are leveraged.
Could buy them at auction, to raze them and plant a small park. Just erase the asshole from our memory.
The E. Jean Carroll park. I love it.
The E. Jean Carroll Immigration Celebration park
- funded by Donald Trump, convicted rapist
Remove his name entirely.
I think it is also very unusual to provide a bond over 100 million, and I assume that they want liquid assets beyond that amount.
I believe in monopoly we call that Game over.
The most basic question for any insurer is : am I going to get my money back ?
It seems to me it would very difficult to imagine any possible scenario in which you get half a billion out of Trump on good day
. Trying to get it from Trump as President? Fuhgedaboudit
Getting the money back from him is easy if you write the correct terms into the contracts. I think they are scared that Trump will try to get "revenge" against them for taking their money back should he lose his appeal.
Not really easy if he does not have the actual money. Which, it seems, he does not.
There's another key point in the article: the reason why those other companies didn't bite is that they would not entertain taking real estate as collateral. Chubb was the only company willing to even try and negotiate that, and Trump couldn't come up with a satisfactory package for them.
Since we already know that Trump overvalued his properties for loan purposes, it is very possible that an objective analysis of their worth vs. their outstanding debt led to the conclusion that they are mostly underwater.
Chubb was the only company willing to even try and negotiate that, and Trump couldn’t come up with a satisfactory package for them.
I'm seeing possibly subtext here that Chubb intentionally screwed Trump which was a surprise.
So Team Trump were talking with Chubb for bonds against both the $91 million judgment as well as the $464 million judgment. Team Trump was offering up both liquid assets (the Schwab brokerage account with whatever stocks and bonds are in there) and real estate. Team Trump really wanted bonds against the real estate.
It looks like Chubb said something like "Hmm, well we have two bonds we're talking about here. Lets do the $91 million bond in purely liquid, and then we can look at the real estate for the $464 million bond. Seeing how you need the $91 million bond in a couple of days lets get that knocked out first". Team Trump agreed handing over all the liquid assets (the Schwab account) so the $91 million bond is now "fully collateralize" meaning liquid money to back up the bond.
Then Team Trump says "Okay the $91 million bond worked great! Now lets do the $464 million bond backed by Trump real estate!"
Chubb says "Hard pass, not interested."
So all the good stuff is gone and Trump has nothing good left to try to secure any bond on the $464 million. Chubb makes whatever commission they placed on top of the $91m bond, and simply pays out the $91m to Jean Carrol when the appeal fails. Jean Carrol wins, Chubb wins, Trump gets played.
I say all of this with zero love for Chubb, but when a grifter gets grifted, its satisfying to watch.
I was so thirsty but now I have many of the Greatest Tears to drink from. This is the Best Thing to happen. Only the Best.