this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
267 points (96.8% liked)

News

22595 readers
4432 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

New documents detail inner workings of Society for American Civic Renewal, group with an emphasis on Christian nationalism

New documents have shed light on the origins and inner workings of the shadowy Society for American Civic Renewal (SACR), including methods for judging the beliefs of potential members on topics such as Christian nationalism, and indications that its founders sought inspiration in an apartheid-era South African white men-only group, the Afrikaner-Broederbond.

They also show that Boise State University Professor and Claremont thinktank scholar Scott Yenor tried to coordinate SACR’s activities with other initiatives, including an open letter on “Christian marriage”.

One expert says that one of the new documents – some previously reported in Talking Points Memo – use biblical references that suggest a preparedness for violent struggle against the current “regime”.

The SACR is a secretive far-right men-only organization with an emphasis on Christian nationalism and a desire to open branches across the US.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 79 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is the real Ya'll-Qaeda that everyone's been talking about.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nah Al Qaida would be the proud boys or one of their other terrorist groups, this group is more the American Taliban, or let's call it what it really is, The Sons of Jacob/Gilead.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (5 children)

The Handmaid’s Tale sounds practically prophetic with some of this stuff. I guess the peeps could be heard back in the 80s for some of these “Christian nationalist” groups.

Let’s call it what it is, they take Christianity and make it their calling card but follow very few, if any, of the actual calls or teachings of Christ. They want to attach to something which has meaning to validate and give authenticity to a meaningless, and destructive, endeavor.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Nah it goes back much further than the 80's, when we're on the topic of the age of American Christian Nationalism I like to break out the only Barry Goldwater quotes I know, the first of which was said in the 60's:

Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them.

Another banger:

I must make it clear that I don't condemn these groups for what they believe. I happen to share many of the values emphasized by these organizations. I'm frankly sick and tired of the political preachers across this country telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in "A," "B," "C" and "D." Just who do they think they are? And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me? And I am even more angry as a legislator who must endure the threats of every religious group who thinks it has some God-granted right to control my vote on every roll call in the Senate. I am warning them today: I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of "conservatism." … This unrelenting obsession with a particular goal destroys the perspective of many decent people. They have become easy prey to manipulation and misjudgment.

Yet another prophetic quote:

There is no position on which people are so immovable as their religious beliefs. There is no more powerful ally one can claim in a debate than Jesus Christ, or God, or Allah, or whatever one calls this supreme being. But like any powerful weapon, the use of God's name on one's behalf should be used sparingly. The religious factions that are growing throughout our land are not using their religious clout with wisdom. They are trying to force government leaders into following their position 100 percent. If you disagree with these religious groups on a particular moral issue, they complain, they threaten you with a loss of money or votes or both.

Another one:

The specter of single-issue religious groups is growing over our land. … One of the great strengths of our political system always has been our tendency to keep religious issues in the background. By maintaining the separation of church and state, the United States has avoided the intolerance which has so divided the rest of the world with religious wars.

Yet another accurate one:

Those who seek absolute power, even though they seek it to do what they regard as good, are simply demanding the right to enforce their own version of heaven on earth. And let me remind you, they are the very ones who always create the most hellish tyrannies. Absolute power does corrupt, and those who seek it must be suspect and must be opposed. Their mistaken course stems from false notions of equality, ladies and gentlemen. Equality, rightly understood, as our founding fathers understood it, leads to liberty and to the emancipation of creative differences. Wrongly understood, as it has been so tragically in our time, it leads first to conformity and then to despotism.

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Barry_Goldwater#:~:text=Tolerance%20in%20the%20face%20of,of%20freedom%20is%20no%20vice.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

This is good stuff, pretty aligned with what I was getting at here. I think this way of thinking has been running rampant for a very long time. Even at the time of Christ, there was a number of sentiments that ran counter to Christ’s teachings that ended up entwining with the beliefs of the church. No one is a perfect listener, some are much worse than others…

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth.

This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.

~C. S. Lewis

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I've seen it said where Musk and Thiel and the other Internet billionaires are the modern robber barons, but one thing to note, they're almost all "Libertarian", they are almost all trying to force some kind of ideology onto us, especially Thiel, since he is completely intertwined with the MAGA movement and the GOP, and they have no goal of contributing to making our country better in the way that Rockefeller, Carnegie, and others of the Gilded Age did.

So while I agree with the spirit of this CS Lewis quote, I believe it is aging like milk.

Here's a good article I found that highlights the contrasts between the old robber barons vs the new:

https://online.maryville.edu/business-degrees/americas-gilded-age/

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

This lot are indubitably amongst those actively calling the teachings of Jesus "weak" so yeah, definitely not Christians.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Oh, we've seen it coming.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

They are Mammonites.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's Bill and Ted's Incellent Adventure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Bogus!

(Loved this new one, thx, lol)

[–] [email protected] 71 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So that satanic cabal of Democrats the QNuts scream about is actually a cabal of conservatives.

The call is coming from inside the house!

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Because every one of their accusations is a projection. The mental gymnastic these ReQublicans do to convince themselves they’re “free thinkers” is astounding. Id kill for an ounce of that sort of confidence in my own beliefs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's actually kind of wild how often it's projection.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's meant to diffuse any potential argument because they strike first and that leaves the reply from "us" to sound like the childish "no, you!"

It muddys the waters so much that you're left with the "both sides" bullshit and that allows you to fall back on choosing whatever side you wanted to in the first place instead of coming to realize that maybe they really are the bad guys.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Agreed. They know they can't ever win the argument so they attack the argument itself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

So do they.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

Yes Christianity tends to do this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They could have at least gone with SCAR, rather than SACR.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Just like the FBI was almost going to be the Federal Investigation Bureau before someone caught on to the acronym for an investigative branch of law enforcement, the conservatives who are actually smart think a lot of stuff through and the name was most likely changed to avoid that embarrassment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

SACR? Sacrilege? Sacrilegious?

Sounds like it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

It's an acronym: Stupid Arrogant Craven Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Fate forbid we ever have to harm anyone, but at least we'll be sending the SACR members to their preferred happy place, if they really want a violent struggle.