From the team:
Our team is currently working on resolving the connection issues experienced by our Linux users, so the app will be temporarily unavailable. We apologize for the inconvenience.
edit:
It should be fixed.
Empowering you to choose a better internet where privacy is the default. Protect yourself online with Proton Mail, Proton VPN, Proton Calendar, Proton Drive. Proton Pass and SimpleLogin.
Proton Mail is the world's largest secure email provider. Swiss, end-to-end encrypted, private, and free.
Proton VPN is the world’s only open-source, publicly audited, unlimited and free VPN. Swiss-based, no-ads, and no-logs.
Proton Calendar is the world's first end-to-end encrypted calendar that allows you to keep your life private.
Proton Drive is a free end-to-end encrypted cloud storage that allows you to securely backup and share your files. It's open source, publicly audited, and Swiss-based.
Proton Pass Proton Pass is a free and open-source password manager which brings a higher level of security with rigorous end-to-end encryption of all data (including usernames, URLs, notes, and more) and email alias support.
SimpleLogin lets you send and receive emails anonymously via easily-generated unique email aliases.
From the team:
Our team is currently working on resolving the connection issues experienced by our Linux users, so the app will be temporarily unavailable. We apologize for the inconvenience.
edit:
It should be fixed.
Ah, looks like an Electron app. Disappointing, but unsurprising.
They could have at least used Tauri.
Not familiar with Tauri. Guess I'll go google that, but what's your reason for suggesting it as a preferable alternative?
Tauri uses the system’s native web rendering engine instead of shipping Chromium with the whole app. As a result you get much smaller app bundles (like 10 MB for a complex app), better startup times and less RAM usage. The downside is that you need to do slightly more testing but the end result is worth it.
I agree, Electron is a nightmare to work with
Electron app
Shame. I do my best to avoid the resource bloat of electron apps whenever possible.
I mean, when my own iron - dual 12-core 24-thread Xeon E5, 128Gb RAM - sees non-trivial impacts from just two or three Electron apps, I do my best to nip that in the bud by avoiding all that crap.
What’s so hard about building a traditional app? With DotNet you could build a single program for all three platforms, and you could bundle DotNet up into that app such that it doesn’t even need a separately-installed sandbox like Java does.
There aren't any great cross platform UI frameworks for .net. There are a few out there, but they are not as robust as what you can do with stuffing a react app into electron.
From what I have seen, AvaloniaUI is getting really close to being the ideal framework for cross-platform desktop use. It has become very polished over the last two years.
MAUI on the other hand, has been falling flat on its face on desktop because it is geared much more towards mobile.
I'd agree that Avalonia has come a long way in a short time. It has a lot of potential, but there aren't a lot of UI control libraries available yet.
I'm using it for a personal project and it's very good for cross platform consistency. The trouble is that building a good looking UI is still difficult. Some of that is my lack of knowledge, but some is lack of available docs, examples, and community.
Here's hoping they keep growing those things and become a viable alternative.
As a .net dev I agree this would be ideal, but I don't do UI much these days so I don't know what's out there for frameworks right now.
I do know one thing that's out there in spades tho, and that's "full stack" JS devs. :P That's probably what's "so hard" about building a traditional app.
And also ironic. Because they're called Proton and they're using Electron to make their app (it's chemistry, ♀️🐶)
Could you explain for a layman why this is disappointing?
As others said, it's basically chrome bundled with the website code so it looks like an app. And while Electron does offer devs the ability to do things a webapp can't, it still brings the chrome browser engine along with all the inefficient ram usage and potential for security flaws that implies.
It’s just the web version wrapped inside an app, not an actual, true, software application.
Plenty of companies started using electron for writing cross platform apps, these apps(electron) use JavaScript engine, which makes it easy to develop these apps but as a tradeoff it uses more system resources than your regular native apps. And when they all do it(discord, vscode, steam etc.) you ask, why the hell do I need these dedicated apps if all they do is just start up a browser? I can just open another tab in firefox or whatever and be done with it.
For linux? Oh shit :(
I like Proton, but I've never wanted a desktop app. Thunderbird is great. It's super annoying to need the external connection client. I'd rather they just spent the energy on native Thunderbird support without a second GUI.
I would prefer they add caldev and carddev to the bridge app so thunderbird can have access to calendar and contacts. I feel that would be better setup for power users, but the integrated desktop app helps normies adopt.
Linux clients are currently only available as .deb or .rpm packages. Just a heads up for folks.
Could someone extract them and rebuild it as a Flatpak?
Doesn't work for me at all on Ubuntu, but nice to see they're finally getting a Linux client out.
Could you report that to the support team please?
Just sent my logs, thanks
It should be fixed. Can you try again?
Late to reply but the issue was fixed.
Proton Mail desktop app officially launches, but remains for premium subscribers only
Encrypted email service Proton Mail is now available via a dedicated desktop app some three months after first arriving in beta.
Reposting as a comment since post got removed.
Thank you! 👌
Will they publish on flathub?
Since it’s just an Electron app, any luck we’ll get that UI on tablets? The iPad app is just a larger iPhone app, it kinda sucks.
Tried the app (Windows).
Firstly, it uses lots of CPU on a pretty powerful machine (7945hx). It at least takes 1-3% idling and up to 40-60% while doing basic tasks.
Secondly, I haven't found jack shit related to background processing for notifications and updates. Wouldn't this be the primary reason to have an app - to get status updates immediately?
Thirdly, it's just a web version with exactly the same UI, exactly the same settings and so on. It literally works better in Firefox than the app itself.
I don't see any reason to use the app over web version in a browser. No, really.
I don't understand who the email apps are for, installing the website as a PWA is a better experience.
Not a Firefox user, eh?
Don't get me started on Firefox PWAs.
I use Firefox, but I have to use a different browser for PWAs, it sucks. If I'm lucky, Epiphany works with that website, otherwise I have to use some Chromium browser. Bleh.
I did that for a while but the links in the PWA kept opening in that browser instead of Firefox. That's why I prefer to use Electron apps, because links open in FF.
Any chance of being able to double click to open a message in a new window? The messages are getting cutoff in the client on MACOS unless I maximize the window.
Do we like this over bridge? That hasn’t been halve bad on Mac.
Does proton drive app support file sync for Mac OS backups like windows does now?