this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3015 readers
103 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Last month, Tory MP Mark Pritchard asked in parliament whether Britain “might actually be hitting the wrong target” in the Middle East.

“It might be the case”, he said, “that while we have the best of diplomatic intentions and we do not want to provoke Iran [into] a major conflict with NATO, the US or the UK, putting off that decision now will cost more lives in the future”.

While acquiescing in Israel’s possession of nuclear arms, British ministers repeatedly say that Iran should “never” be allowed to acquire such weapons. They have threatened to consider “all options” if Tehran appears close to doing so.

Over recent months, the British media has also been talking up the prospect of military action against Iran.

Sky News’ military analyst Sean Bell deliberated the utility of “a series of calibrated strikes against Iran”. He added that there is a “limit to how many diplomatic options you’ve got on the table if you want to keep trade flowing”.

Con Coughlin, the Telegraph’s defence and foreign affairs editor, declared that the “West is now at war with Iran and its proxies”, adding we “shouldn’t fear a direct confrontation with Tehran”.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Reading the headline I guessed "the frothing at the mouth parts of the Tory party and the right wing press". Turns out I wasn't wrong.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Nothing would be a greater distraction then placing a war between and their absolute trash governing over the past several years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn't be at all surprised (horrified, yes) to learn Iran has a nuke.

The same happened with North Korea.

Our years of inaction/policies have led to events that made all this possible. We have only ourselves to blame.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I can't really blame them either. If you don't want to be invaded by the USA and end up like Iraq or Afghanistan, you have to be able to defend yourself.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And Libya. Giving up their nuclear deterrence and trusting imperial core countries to improve relations with them in return instead of destabilizing and invading them like they actually did was a grave mistake.

Basically

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The world is a safer place if Iran has nukes. It will deter the genocidal west from invading it and starting another dumb fucking war.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Liberals will see imperial core countries committing a genocide and still think their adversaries shouldn't be able to resist them.