254
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 69 points 4 months ago

But privately, some Republicans have complained about the venue choice. Sources said Speaker Mike Johnson selected the Greenbrier Resort because it was “family friendly,” in a break from past retreats which have taken place in sunny Florida – the preferred location of former Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

Family Values^TM^

[-] [email protected] 47 points 4 months ago

But privately, some Republicans have complained about the venue choice. Sources said Speaker Mike Johnson selected the Greenbrier Resort because it was “family friendly,”

Lol, what did they expect to happen when they made the religious nut speaker? They're lucky it's not Ned Flanders Bible Camp lmfao

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Speaker Mike Johnson selected the Greenbrier Resort

How did I not catch that part of the article. That's in my state.

If they do all show up, our average IQ will drop at least 15 points for the duration of the retreat, and we don't really have any to spare.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I only know about this from Fallout 76, can you go in the top secret government tunnels these days?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I honestly have no idea. I know of them but have never visited or toured it.

Their website says yes: https://www.greenbrier.com/activities/bunker-tours/

As much as I'd like to tour those, it's owned by our current governor's family, and I don't want to give them any money.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

"What about the cocaine orgies?!"

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Exact quote from Matt Gaetz

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

As long as you include the whole family it is fine.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Greenbrier is really nice too. But yea, no debauchery is gonna happen there considering there’s really nothing remotely nearby. But the tour of the military installation underneath is really fucking rad.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

It's also an odd thing to act like Congress needs to go some place that is family-friendly, whatever that means. Aren't these functional adults?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

It means no extramarital sex or drugs. Generally other workplaces would call it a more professional environment

[-] [email protected] 40 points 4 months ago

That sentiment is fully understandable for, like a family reunion or spending holidays with the in-laws.

For a governing body, it's...yikes.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

So is this ‘retreat’ where they plan their next insurrection

[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What do they even have to discuss anyways? It's not like the GOP even bothers with a policy platform anymore other than hurt outsiders, obstruct, and get money. The RNC "learn more" link to their platform just directs to a list of committee procedures. Even if there are individuals with integrity they have mostly left or retired, with the remaining standing for nothing but greed and paranoia, aligning politically with authoritarian dictators. The electoral college is going to bury us propping up two parties if GOP cannot clean house and a thirty party cannot gain political momentum to compete with the democratic party.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Yeah, bet it's to avoid alienating the Qanon crowd by having a very publicly-known private meeting. Let's not forget they're courting the conspiracy theorists, doing their best to make conspiracy theories go mainstream.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Many Republicans plan to skip the House GOP retreat as they grumble about both the location and the idea of spending time with one another, with tensions still running high inside the party in the wake of their unprecedented speakership drama.

Meanwhile, when asked if he was attending, GOP Rep. Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota told CNN: “No way, I have to run for governor.” And Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee quipped: “I don’t retreat, I move forward!

And other GOP lawmakers and aides told CNN they were simply not enthusiastic about the idea of having to huddle with the rest of their party at a time when Republican infighting has prevented them from even passing procedural votes.

In another hiccup for the retreat, the House GOP’s keynote speaker – Fox Business Host Larry Kudlow – had to drop out at the last minute, sources say.

Among the Republicans who have decided to skip the retreat include Rep. Mark Green of Tennessee, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee; Reps.

Dusty Johnson of South Dakota and Stephanie Bice of Oklahoma, the co-chairs of the Main Street Caucus; and Rep. Dave Joyce of Ohio, chairman of the Republican Governance Group.


The original article contains 383 words, the summary contains 199 words. Saved 48%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
254 points (97.7% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3578 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS