The Oromo people would customarily plant a coffee tree on the graves of powerful sorcerers. They believed that the first coffee bush sprang up from the tears that the god of heaven shed over the corpse of a dead sorcerer.
Currently I love the James Hoffmann's 1 cup V60 using 15g/250ml ratio.
I generally don't like to overcomplicate things and keep it pretty simple. When not at home brewing just for myself my go-to method is 30g/500ml with ~50ml water 30s blooming (45s for Chemex) then pour the rest and gently swirl after a bit.
I've been using a v60 over the chemex, and I "went back to basics" and looked up Hoffman's method. I hadn't realized how "off" my coffee was. Not a drastic change, but a noticeable improvement. Like Dessalines mentioned, its a bit stronger for me, too. But I just need to tweak the ratio.
It's a good, simple method.
I've tried that one before, but for whatever reason its too damn strong for me haha.
You could try to lower the amount of coffee to something like 13-14g and see if that makes any difference.
Currently I'm mostly doing something close to Lance Hedrick's current recipe.
It uses a relatively coarse grind and relatively high agitation. It's a little confusing at first but the idea essentially is that instead of doing a brew, tasting it, and adjusting your next brew to be a little better (Hoffmann style), you eyeball the drawdown rate and add more or less agitation depending on the speed. So instead of dialing entirely between brews, you are doing some correction on the fly during the brew itself, leading to fewer bad cups of coffee.
I'm careful during the initial pour to not drown the coffee. Success is when I can get the coffee wet without forcing coffee up the sides of the cone filter. I try to move the pouring water around around over the coffee when I pour to make sure that everything is getting directly hit by water. I stop pouring once the bubbles that form on top of the coffee are no longer brownish-looking. If that's a method, then I do whatever that is called.
Seems very close to osmotic flow... at least that's what some ppl call it. Ya I've found that not drowning the coffee, and not pouring after the bubble get to the top, tastes much better.
All other things being equal (coffee quality, brewing method, grind level, etc), underextraction or overextraction is always worth keeping in mind. I never liked my grandmother's percolator coffee because it ran water through the same coffee repeatedly. I try to use methods that, in spite of their implementation differences, put a reasonable amount of water through a sane amount of coffee a single time.
Thanks, I will try this out tomorrow morning.
It varies (a lot) depending on which brewer I'm using, but I always keep it simple. For a normal V60 it's just a 1:2 bloom for 30-45s, then about 60% of the remaining water poured quickly and allowed to draw down, then the rest of the water a bit slower. It's easy, it's consistent, and it makes a great cup.
I do a combo between Hoffman's perfect single cup method and Scott Rao's method. I start with a wetted and warmed v60 with a wetted coffee sock cotton filter
The Tetsu God/Devil technique for the Hario Switch is my go-to right now. I use Hoffmann's iced filter recipe for iced coffee though.
Nice, I'll have to check that out.
I started off with the Hoffman Ultimate v60 technique and really enjoyed my cups. Then just to change things up I switched to the Tetsu Kasuya 4:6 Method, and have been getting more sweetness and highlighting different flavors of the beans, so that’s been fun. Next I’ll switch up to some of the other recipes listed here, so thanks for the post!
Been using Tetsu Kasuya method as well, and coffee is great.