this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
49 points (93.0% liked)

Games

16948 readers
419 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

For reference Ninja’s deal with Mixer was reportedly $50m

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And I feel like that marked the end of his time in the public view.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

I think that might be more of a coincidence. He had a look, and he had a persona, and he was great at Fortnite. But as Fortnite has waned in popularity, it was sure that Ninja would as well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

why would you keep doing your job once you get that much money lol, fuck that I'm retiring after the contract is over

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wow, I thought the days of streamers receiving huge contracts to join a platform were over. I’m sure having xQc streaming on Kick will be beneficial, but is it really $70 million beneficial? Facebook and Youtube have both paid a ton of money to get big streamers from twitch, but I don’t feel like that moved the needle much.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Kick seems to be getting more attention from streamers moving of their own accord than Facebook or Mixer did, at least. I doubt it'll go a lot better than Mixer in the long run, but it's at least better for everyone on Twitch if they have competition to worry about.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That’s insane, Kick must be desperate, wow.

[–] nanoUFO 19 points 2 years ago

They are run by a gambling company, basically one of the infinite money glitches irl. They just want to be able to advertise their gambling service and twitch hit them hard.

[–] iSharted 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What does this have over twitch? Are they less uptight about rules etc?

[–] inbano 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The main point that always is brought up is allowing gambling/slot streaming, but yeah what you said is more or less on point (gambling gets brought up because of it direct ties to the owners/sponsors/investors with such sites).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So they're worse and just a way for those streamers to foster addiction and promote gambling to children? That's amazing

[–] Jck2905 2 points 2 years ago

Truly scum business behavior.

[–] iSharted 6 points 2 years ago

So they're just kicking everyone in the balls and hoping coins fall out. Risky bet...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm still hesitant to sign up on Kick from what happened with Mixer and Facebook. Not to mention, nobody is going to Kick without a Kick-specific contract. No streamer is just gonna wake up and be like, "Lemme jump to Kick and rebuild my audience from scratch just for funsies."

load more comments
view more: next ›