this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
295 points (99.7% liked)

Space

8347 readers
66 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but it STILL landed right-side up. A fine example for moon landers everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

NASA was able to land this right side up on Mars! With a missing rotor!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

"Not where it counts"

[–] [email protected] 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It makes me sad in ways I cannot put into words but I'm happy to witness such an amazing achievement of science and determination.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

It makes me sad to think that Perseverance has to leave Ingenuity behind. They went on this amazing journey together across the stars but now Perseverance has to keep going. I hope they can be reunited one day in the future.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 months ago

Way to go little buddy. There'll be a monument built around you in the coming years.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I imagine the entire RC copter community has ideas on how to jury rig Ingenuity back into flight, while knowing it will only work for like 25 seconds.

It's traditional to try to make one more (usually catastrophic) flight before making a trip to fetch the correct repair parts.

I'm not sure if that tradition holds on Mars, but I look forward to finding out.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This happened last month. On January 6, Ingenuity flew 40 feet (12 meters) skyward but then made an unplanned early landing after just 35 seconds. Twelve days later, operators intended to troubleshoot the vehicle with a quick up-and-down test. Data from the vehicle indicated that it ascended to 40 feet again during this test, but then communications were ominously lost at the end of the flight.

Sounds like NASA is of a similar mindset already.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

That's amazing. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tbf, the little drone had an incredible run, doing dozens of flights when it was originally designed to only do a few. NASA makes some incredibly good designs. I'm really looking forward to their future rovers and aircraft :)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

The craziest thing was none of the hardware for Integrity was rated for space, radiation, dust, or mars. The right hardware would have been too heavy. So it basically the guts out of a few year old cellphone strapped to a rotator. Which actually gave it more computing power then all other NASA unmanned missions combined. They genuinely didn't even know if it would survive the trip to Mars.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So that’s a no on more flights I guess…

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, not with that attitude...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Scubus 2 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I suspect the sandy wind either from flight start up, landing, or from the environment probably grinded the blades eventually resulting to this. Still it's impressive that it lasted this long and let's not forget that this thing runs in Linux. Hurray for Linux!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was wondering if the blade failure caused the emergency landing, or the emergency landing caused the blade failure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

A little of column A and a little of column B.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

It's ok we're still flying half a ship

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I can't believe the blade would do that and let the whole helicopter down like that