A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Corporations will have to accept non-record breaking profit margins to beat inflation, says regular Joe
b-b-but the ecomony!!1
That $1 billionth dollar banked comes with a free trip to the guillotine.
Feel free to earn just as much as you want, but spend it on something.
Oh fun, a real life prisoner's dilemma.
I bet we can all guess whether employers hold up their end of the bargain by reining in profits. Gotta make sure those shareholders get theirs.
Lmao what a load of bs shit
Accept lower pay deals... Are prices going to decrease in the short term? Nope.
They expect people to live on bread and water because they fucked everyone too hard.
Fuck them
Funny how it's never the upper class that has to give.
Quiet! They'll hear you!
This is what Brixit was all about. British corporations wanted to slash wages but couldn't under the EU because British labor would just leave. But now their stuck and now the employers are going full mask off
It took me embarrassingly long to realize you meant the British labor force would leave, as in they'd get jobs in France or something, rather than the British LaborParty would leave (and go where, I couldn't figure out)...
Let's seize the means of production and find out for ourselves how to beat inflation.
Yeah right. We've had next to no wage increases over the last 15 years but workers still carry the can. Totally ignore the energy companies raising their prices significantly based on costs yet still make huge record profits. Ditto supermarkets.
ill accept lower pay rises when I see lower profits, and CEOs refusing rises / giving back money to pay employees instead.
Haha. What else? How about lowering taxes on corporations and ultra wealthy? That obscene wealth will eventually trickle down, you know!
Okey dokey, you go first.
If it is anything like here in the US, it is price gouging causing a large chunk of inflation.
How about UK CEOs must accept lower pay deals to help beat inflation?
F that. Someone's trying to grab a bigger splice of the pie by cutting into mine, time to push back.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Victory in the war on inflation will require British workers to accept lower pay deals and companies to rein in their profits, a senior Bank of England policymaker has said.
In a speech almost a week after she and fellow policymakers kept interest rates unchanged at the highest levels since the 2008 financial crisis, she said inflation in the service sector of the economy remained too high to meet the Bank’s target.
Financial markets anticipate that falling inflation and near-stagnant economic growth should open the door to the Bank cutting interest rates by as much as one percentage point this year, from the current level of 5.25%.
The Bank’s policymakers are, however, concerned that underlying inflationary pressures from the domestic economy could drive inflation closer to 3% by the end of the year, highlighting risks from rising service sector prices and resilient wage increases.
Speaking at an event for the UK Women in Economics Network, Breeden said that indicators of annual pay growth remained in the 6-7% range, significantly higher than recorded in recent years.
The monthly survey, which is closely watched by the Bank for early warning signs from the economy, found permanent salary inflation had dropped to a 34-month low, highlighting “ongoing uncertainty around the economic outlook”.
The original article contains 540 words, the summary contains 209 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
I tried to refuse pay for on call recently as it has tax implications that I didn't want to do deal with, but my employer refused.
So, yeah, take it up with them you bunch of bankers.
bunch of bankers.
The correct collective noun for bankers is a "wunch of bankers"
TIL