this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
272 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18651 readers
4054 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 84 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Mr. Gaetz has claimed that the inquiry is in retaliation for him raping and trafficking underage girls

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (6 children)

For anyone else who'd like to speculate why Mr. Gaetz seems to be being treated with kid's gloves over these allegations, I'd like to remind people who his brother-in-law is.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago (1 children)

TIL one of the Oculus founders is a right wing military industrial complex bro.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

VR headsets are how you steer suicide drones to their target. Turns out to be the real killer app for VR in a way that games and entertainment were not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I wonder if the drone pilots look like this while they're doing their thing?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

kid’s gloves

It’s “kid gloves.” It refers to gloves made of kid leather, the skin of a young goat. Not a child’s glove.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/origin-of-phrase-with-kid-gloves

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Thanks. Apparently I've been saying that phrase wrong my whole life...

I'm going to leave the comment as-is tho for the unintentional pun it created.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it's a joke, Matt Gaetz rapes kids and sells kids to be raped

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

It’s always the goddamn fortunate sons.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

So gloves made from kids?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

treated with kid’s gloves

I see what you did there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

"ranked number 22 on Forbes' 2016 List of America's Richest Entrepreneurs Under 40.[4]" from Wikipedia. Started with Oculus VR, and moved into defense technology, autonomous drones and sensors for military applications. Sounds lovely. /s

[–] gravitas_deficiency 2 points 6 months ago

Ah, I did not know that. Fascinating. And quite telling.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Reports that the victims were offered extra credit in their Civics classes to come forward have not yet been substantiated.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Greenberg is a foul SOB which is one reason the DOJ couldn't put him on the stand, but the ethics committee has no such qualms.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Two tiered US justice system on full embarrassing display (yet again)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Attaboy Beavis!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Good! I want to see Gaetz go down.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


He had previously cooperated with a Justice Department investigation into whether Mr. Gaetz had engaged in sex trafficking of a minor, a federal offense that carries a minimum of 10 years in prison.

Last year, the Justice Department quietly closed the inquiry into Mr. Gaetz after investigators concluded they could not make a strong enough case against him in court, people familiar with the matter said.

A spokeswoman for Mr. Gaetz, Jillian L. Wyant, said on Friday that the Justice Department had received the same material as that sent to the Ethics Committee and “deemed it unreliable and declined to press charges.” The news media, she added, “should not be laundering smears from people in prison.”

It is unclear how useful the documents will be to the committee, which began its investigation into Mr. Gaetz several months ago, after concluding one into George Santos, the former New York representative who had fabricated large portions of his background as he ran for Congress.

Mr. Gaetz has claimed that the inquiry is in retaliation against him for taking the lead in ousting Kevin McCarthy as House speaker.

Mr. Scheller said at the time that the Justice Department’s decision proved that the country had “two systems” — one that favors politicians like Mr. Gaetz and penalizes those who are less powerful, like Mr. Greenberg.


The original article contains 430 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 49%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!