462
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 124 points 5 months ago

I hope someone on the Biden team is collecting all these clips of Republicans saying the quiet part out loud, that they would rather sabotage Biden than help Americans, so they can be placed in campaign ads later this year.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 5 months ago

and the redhats will scream fake news while voting trump in a local school board election.

[-] [email protected] 99 points 5 months ago

Needs to be front and center in every campaign ad in every red state.

Why don't we have a border solution?

Donald Trump - "It's not going to happen, and I'll fight it all the way."

Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson -  "Dead on arrival."

Why don't we have a tax bill?

89 year old Republican Senator Chuck Grassley - "Passing a tax bill that makes the president look good — mailing out checks before the election — means he could be re-elected, and then we won’t extend the 2017 tax cuts."

[-] [email protected] 77 points 5 months ago

"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."

This has been their entire platform for awhile now.

[-] [email protected] 58 points 5 months ago

it's so cool that this is how our government works. and he's just allowed to fucking say that

[-] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago

Wow, you know these politicians are fucked when they refuse to make life better for people simply because it would boost the reputation of someone they are against. Talk about skewed priorities.

Politicians aren't good at understanding that they should be there to do the right thing regardless of consequences anymore.

Even in my home country they haven't done a true "screw the consequences, I'm doing what's right" since they introduced gun control in 1996.

What a fucked up world we live in.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Have you not seen the lady who is mad because the president is not hurting the right people?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Wow, I don't think presidents are supposed to hurt anybody. Ffs. Need to some how change American political culture to be a little less fucked. Greed, party bashing, and warmongering need to be far less prevalent.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago

Imagine hating your opponents so much that you refuse to pass a bill that would benefit so many Americans out of fear that it might give your opponents an advantage and a PR boost.

[-] Grass 16 points 5 months ago

Because they already take credit for stuff their opponents did that was well received and they figure the same will be done to them

[-] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago

It must be nice to be a GOP senator paid to do nothing all day and just reject anything helpful. Their base is fine with these type of actions.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

We used to say “they said the quiet part out loud” but for about six years I don’t think they care.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

I hate that phrase, it just shows how ignorant people have been of the right. They have been saying all those things loud and proud forever, even if you weren't paying attention to them.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Same. It also kinda reminds me of those reductive reddit comments. After 10 years of being on there, I felt like I could easily predict the top 5 comments on the vast majority of posts. It's like a call & response, but without any of the fun parts.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Grow up. Grow the fuck up.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

But that would spoil the game they're busy playing with ~300,000,000 peoples' lives.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

I'm 56. When I was in Kindergarten my parents say I shook hands with Chuck Grassley as he marched in a parade for one of his early campaigns in Cedar Falls/Waterloo Iowa. Retire already.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Sorry to hear about your hand. :-/

[-] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

Did he fold his arms and stomp his feet

[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Looks for c/theonion
Doesn't see c/theonion
Fuck.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, cast doubt Wednesday on passing a bipartisan tax bill, saying it could make President Joe Biden "look good" and improve Democrats' chances of holding the White House in the 2024 election.

Grassley said re-electing Biden could hurt Republican hopes of extending Trump-era tax cuts.

A 2021 child tax credit included monthly checks for qualifying parents, but they are not in the newly negotiated bill.

The Republican-controlled House Ways and Means Committee said in a statement last week that under the legislation, the Biden administration would be “explicitly prohibited” from “manipulating the bill’s tax relief in an attempt to send politically timed refund checks.”

The spokesperson added that Grassley "looks forward to providing input" when a Finance Committee markup is scheduled.

Grassley made the comments ahead of an expected House vote to pass the bill.


The original article contains 462 words, the summary contains 140 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
462 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3649 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS