this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
9 points (58.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

25999 readers
2291 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is there a word that means "a hatred of gay people", rather than "a fear of or aversion to gay people"? Surely there are people who simply hate homosexuality without necessarily fearing it, and vice versa. Someone who hates homosexuality should probably be condemned for their unreasonable and hateful prejudices, but should someone who actually fears homosexuality but without hating it be condemned in the same way? Why isn't there a distinction?

And similarly, why do we have words like "arachnophobia" which means a fear of something (not necessarily a hatred of it; though you might hate what you fear, that isn't necessarily always the case, nor is the opposite always true either (fearing what you hate)), but "homophobia" is used to mean "hatred of homosexuality" rather than a genuine fear of it without necessarily hating it?

It makes me feel a bit sorry (as much as one can) for people who might genuinely be afraid of the idea of homosexuality, maybe even struggling with their own sexuality or possibly in denial of being homosexual themself, but without hating it at all (even possibly being supportive of it), not having a word that conveys a fear of the concept/phenomenon without any kind of disdain for it, since "homophobia" would generally be interpreted to mean something far more negative. Usually when someone has a phobia for something, we support them to deal with it in a non-accusatory way, but in this case, well, I guess there isn't even a word for that kind of phobia if it's actually a phobia in the usual sense.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You’re trying to take a prescriptivist position on the meaning of the word “homophobia”, defining it as meaning “fear of homosexuality or homosexuals”.

But English doesn’t work that way. English words are defined descriptively not prescriptively. The definition of a word is changed to match how people use the word. When a word is commonly used with a new meaning the people who make dictionaries will change the definition to match how the word is used.

Homophobia can describe a fear or homosexuality, but it’s more commonly used to describe hostility or discrimination against homosexuals.

And as a result the Oxford English Dictionary now defines homophobia as “Hostility towards, prejudice against, or (less commonly) fear of homosexual people or homosexuality.”

Most words that end in -phobia do generally just describe a fear. But when we’re talking about a class of people, words ending in -phobia (e.g transphobia, Islamophobia, etc) we tend to use the hate, prejudice, and hostility meaning instead.

It doesn’t matter that “phobias” were at one time exclusively just irrational fears. If the majority of English speakers use the word to describe hate, that’s its meaning.

If anything, we now need a new word to describe “fear of homosexuality without prejudice towards homosexuals”. Because homophobia already means, to use your words, “a hatred of gay people”.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Fears also takes more forms than staying away from something. People with what you might define as more conventional phobias would avoid the thing they don't like (maybe spiders), many would hate the thing and others may even seek to destroy it.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Xenophobia and racism are not related. Xenophobia is about foreigners regardless of race, and racism is about race regardless of nationality. The two get mixed in the head of people from the USA because a lot of guys claim they're Irish or Italian without ever having set foot in any of those countries. If you dislike your [insert ethnicity] neighbour who was born and grew up in the same place as you did, you're being racist. If you dislike your [insert nationality] neighbour who's the same ethnicity as you, you're being xenophobic.

-phobia means an irrational intolerance, for a lot of things we express intolerance by showing fear, but to others we show aggressiveness. It depends more on the person than the subject matter, some homophobics are actually afraid of gays, thinking they'll corrupt the children or whatever stupid fearmongering propaganda they're up to these days, meanwhile some arachnofobics will kill every spider they see. And their line of thought is often quite similar, e.g. I don't hate [gays/spiders], I just don't want to see them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Every European: "but my hatred of the French is prefectly rational, does that mean it's not xenophobia?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Europe is not just UK. UK isn't even EU anymore, and I have never seen negative sentiments towards french people in the rest of Europe.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

As a German, I can assure you, there are plenty of people with negative sentiments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I lived in Rhineland-Palatinate when I was young and I remember asking my neighbors why every Saturday they all came out to trim their grass and sweep their sidewalks and gutters clean. They said it was to show that they are not French.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I hoped it'd be read as sarcasm

It's not a serious hatred, but most major/Western European nations (at least Germany, UK, Spain, Italy and probably France themselves) have at least a friendly rivalry with the French despite being on friendly terms either since 1945 or even longer, with France having been fairly positive for Europe since at least the 80s, so it's incredibly hard to justify that the "hatred" of them is rational

Although the Italians may have twisted it into a surprisingly valid case, just ask about how almost all famous French food is just Italian recipes with a French name and they will be incredibly convincing even if it may not be objective fact

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

and racism is about race regardless of nationality.

I don't understand it, but I met an American who doesn't like African Americans, but has no issues with actual Africans.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

He's racist, "African-American" means black, i.e. an ethnicity not a nationality, he doesn't mind Africans because they're not near him. A similar thing for a xenophobe would be I have no problem with Mexicans, it's the Mexican immigrants I hate. Or from an aracnophobe: I understand spiders have their place in nature, I just don't want them in my house.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Is there a word that means “a hatred of gay people”, rather than “a fear of or aversion to gay people”?

No, because that's just semantic wiggle room to give bigots a way of excusing their bigotry.

For example. "I don't hate gay people, and I'm not afraid of them, so I'm not homophobic. I just don't want to see them, and they shouldn't be able to get married". It's a statement that is clearly biased against queer folk, and that's the issue that needs to be addressed. But discussions like the one you're suggesting just lead to irrelevant arguments over exactly what type of bigotry is being displayed, rather than telling the bigot to get bent, which suits the needs of the bigots fine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I appreciate what you're saying, certainly someone could claim to be just afraid of homosexuality while using that as a cover for actually hating it or being prejudiced against it or homosexual people. But I think bigotry, meaning "obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief, opinion, or faction, in particular prejudice against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group", doesn't exactly fit the hypothetical I described of a person who's just afraid of the concept without harboring any hateful feelings or displaying any discriminatory behaviors toward it. Shouldn't we help that person come to terms with their fear and be understanding, while certainly helping them to tackle that fear (without accusing them of doing something wrong, presuming that they weren't hypothetically)?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (11 children)

certainly someone could claim to be just afraid of homosexuality while using that as a cover for actually hating it or being prejudiced against it or homosexual people

It's not that someone "could" do this. They already do. They will come up with a million excuses as to why they're not bigoted/prejudiced.

You know the cliche "I'm not racist, but..." That's the phenomena in action.

doesn’t exactly fit the hypothetical I described

And that's the core of my issue with your whole question.

You're trying to solve a hypothetical scenario that doesn't occur in any meaningful way, with a solution that makes it easier for bigots to display their bigotry with less pushback. It doesn't solve any real world issues that can't already be addressed by conversation with a therapist, and it does it by creating further opportunities for bigots to pretend that they aren't bigoted.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

doesn’t exactly fit the hypothetical I described of a person who’s just afraid of the concept without harboring any hateful feelings or displaying any discriminatory behaviors toward it.

I can't think of a single example of this in reality. Phobia isn't 'just afraid' in the context you're using, it's an irrational terror. People who are arachnophobic aren't 'just afraid' they're terrified of spiders. That is due to an inherent part of our past (as humans) that taught us spiders/snakes/etc were a danger and to avoid them, and for these people their brain changes 'I should avoid that danger' to 'I should do literally anything to get away from that danger.'

There's no precedent for 'people of the same gender who love each other' being a source of terror. Nothing in our collective past would cause that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Who said fears need to be rational? I think people can be afraid/terrified of anything. Anatidaephobia (the fear of being watched by a duck or goose), for example.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Psst, anatidaephobia isn't real. It's a term coined by a comedian.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I see what you mean. I guess it's hard though because currently they can already say that (they aren't afraid of gay people and therefore aren't "homophobic" if interpeting the word literally, but they just hate them), whereas if there was a word that meant hatred of gay people, they would have to admit they are that thing instead, which would then be viewed worse by society in a similar way to racism or misogyny etc. If a word existed for it, they would have no recourse but to admit that even if they aren't technically homophobic (though they are by the common understanding and usage of the word), they are still word that means hateful/discriminatory toward gay people. And if there's no distinction, I don't know what we can say to people who aren't hateful but just afraid of the idea of homosexuality. What do they tell their therapist? "I have a fear of homosexuality and/or gay people but I don't hate it/them"? That's a mouthful and a simple word could suffice couldn't it?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

I see what you mean. I guess it’s hard though because currently they can already say that

And you're right, they do. But I've got little interest in providing them with more nuance to explain why they want me to have less rights than them.

whereas if there was a word that meant hatred of gay people, they would have to admit they are that thing instead

No, they wouldn't. They would just say that they don't hate queer folk, because they don't want to hurt/exile/kill them etc. They do this already.

"I don't hate gay folk, but... "

I don’t know what we can say to people who aren’t hateful but just afraid of the idea of homosexuality.

In all my years, I've never encountered such a person. If they do exist, then they can just explain it to their therapist in full sentences as needed, rather than normalising some forms of bigotry.

Even if someone is "afraid" of gay folk, that's still their problem. It's something they need to work on, rather than pushing the mental cost of working through their irrational fears on people that are already unfairly targeted by bigotry.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's worth mentioning that, while "phobia" can mean "an irrational fear of," it also often means "an irrational intolerance of," such as in the case of homophobia. It's not a fear, it's an intolerance.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I always assumed that the "phobia" suffix was deliberately misused to emasculate the subject

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Maybe the intolerance comes from the fear, eh.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. There is a word for it. It's called homophobia.

I have no idea why so many people seem to believe that the word is defined as a fear of gay people. No one is running from us like a mouse, dude.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (6 children)

It doesn't actually mean fear in those contexts. Etymologically yes, it comes from the Ancient Greek for fear. For all other purposes, that doesn't really matter. If you're anti-gay then you are a homophobe - case closed, just another English term with slightly odd etymology that is irrelevant to how it's actually used by literally everyone. There are thousands of those.

People starting in on "well, achkchually that means FEAR" just want to either nitpick irrelevant trivia, or hide behind a difference that doesn't really exist. It's like pretending the term "hydrophobic" is wrong "because water can't feel emotions": incorrect, irrelevant, just... a weird argument, and if someone brings it up all the time, you sort of have to wonder what their deal is.

The hypothetical "unwilling bigots", the ones genuinely afraid through no fault of their own, causing no harm and carrying no ill will... I'll empathize with them when I get a reason to believe they exist.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

What an absurd (and arguably harmful) distinction to make. Nobody is "afraid of homosexuality" for reasons unrelated to homophobia.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

I've seen the word homomisia and the general suffix -misia used to reflect that a lot of "phobias" really mean hatred and not fear.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The suffix -misia meana hatred. Both -misia and -phobia come from Greek.

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/-misia

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

isn't misia used as a prefix? As in Misanthrop or Misogyn

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Heterosexist.

See also heteronormativity. The latter is a major cause of the former.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Fear leads to panic, panic leads to pain, pain leads to anger, anger leads to hate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I don’t have an answer, I just wanted to say it blew my mind that I never thought about this

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

fuckerism — prejudice against people on the basis of who they fuck (or would like to fuck).


In general, morphology doesn't dictate meaning; the fact that "homophobia" and "arachnophobia" are similarly constructed words doesn't mean they have to have analogous meanings.

Pornography is not played on a pornograph turntable.

Racism is not the same sort of thing as communism, cubism, masochism, autism, or Buddhism. The fact that those words all end in "-ism" doesn't mean they are close analogies to one another. The words "sexism", "ageism" and "ableism", though, were coined as deliberate analogies to "racism".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

After researching your great word fuckerism (which I'm guessing you coined since I can't easily find mentions of it online), I found this: Sexual orientation discrimination (also known as sexualism) is discrimination based on a person's sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or pregnancy.. This isn't entirely clear and could be interpreted as relating to "sexualising", which means to make something sexual, and "homosexism" might be more specific to discrimination against homosexual people.

We also have a related concept of gender binarism (or in some uses, genderism (such as here, here) (though genderism can also apparently mean the opposite thing, to negatively describe gender-non-binarism(?), or what is referred to as "gender ideology" by people with "anti-gender" prejudice)) to describe specifically discrimination of "gender nonconfirming" (or non-binary-gendered) individuals (rather than transphobia or LGBTphobia for the same lexical confusion theoretically). Anti-genderism also makes sense as a term for this, I suppose. Anti-LGBTism ([Anti-LGBT rhetoric](Anti-LGBTism [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-LGBT_rhetoric)) could also work as a term for discrimination against LGBT people in general (horrific paper).

I also found a term, HOCD, which can mean excessive fear of becoming or being homosexual, though it can also literally means a form of OCD relating to homosexuality, but it's the closest thing to "fear of homosexuality" ("FOHO"?) that I found, albeit a form that only applies to a fear around one's own possible homosexuality rather than a fear of homosexuality in general regardless of one's own sexuality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

which I’m guessing you coined since I can’t easily find mentions of it online

Yes, that was an attempt at humor. My point was that we don't need a word fitting a specific morphology in order to talk about a topic. And when we need to be so specific as to refer to "prejudice on the basis of sexual or romantic orientation" or "violent hostility towards people perceived as gender nonconformists" we can spell those things out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My aunt is afraid of spiders but my uncle he hates people

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@numan Lucky for them there is only one spiderman.

@Lafari

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›