this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
46 points (85.9% liked)

Games

16944 readers
232 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In Starfield, there will be procedurally generated content, but there will be manually created areas. So, I understand this as: "Outlaws will be smaller scale, but we are trying to spin it in marketing speech".

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a fair enough point to highlight, I think.

You're making an open world game in space, launching around the same time as an open world game in space from a developer thats famous for "quantity over quality" worlds. Unless starfield totally flops, then odds are everything similar will be compared to it for years to come, the same way open world fantasy games were compared to Skyrim and Oblivion before it.

Making a point of highlighting how your game is different from starfield is not bad move, especially in a time where people are becoming more and more jaded with big open world games.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely. Imagine how hard can it be to make a whole city fun and full of content. Now apply that to a whole freaking planet!. There's absolutely now way that manual work can beat procedural + manual work... I mean, by definition it's just LESS stuff.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

sounds great but they’re talking about having multiple hand-crafted areas that are larger than entire regions in recent assassins creed games which means at least one of a few things

  1. this game isn’t coming out for years
  2. the amount of crunch needed to get this game out the door is going to be horrendous
  3. the game will be huge but also insanely empty
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also there's no way they aren't procedurally generating large portions of maps before building it out by hand. It's just part of a reasonable workflow now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

yep, this is also 100% on the money.

[–] yata 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
the game will be huge but also insanely empty

Most likely, especially since this is ubisoft after all, but I don't see why this naturally follows having a hand crafted world in your line of arguments. On the contrary procedurally created worlds are usually the ones which are most prone to be huge but empty (or bloated with similar copy pasted content).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

my thought process was essentially: without enormous amounts of crunch (or slave labor) to fill in these spaces, they will wind up with hand crafted-but-empty spaces if they want to launch the game on any reasonable timetable

[–] PeterPoopshit 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I think there was an elder scrolls game that used procedural generation for a lot of the map but all the important areas were hand made. There's no way they can hand make a galaxy full of planets without sacrificing something important somewhere. Why can't they just procedurally generate some of it? Is the no procedural generation supposed to be a selling point?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

in the post-no man’s sky era, “procgen” kind of has a bit of a bad rap unfortunately. as wary as i am of starfield (i don’t think it will be good), their method of using procgen for the broader world and handcrafting specific zones seems like the way to go

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

For Oblivion they touted the use of procedural generation to create the ‘realistic’ outdoor environments, not to generate content on the fly.

At the time Oblivion was great - I remember spending heaps of time just collecting plants because the outdoor environment and the music were beautiful. And then getting mauled by a bear.

[–] WintLizard 1 points 1 year ago

You're thinking of daggerfall

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Thank goodness. I always find precedural generations so devoid of character. And if a star wars game should have anything at all, it should have unique environments that feel like they belong in universe.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Developer Massive Entertainment - with publisher Ubisoft - proudly claimed the game was the "first ever open-world Star Wars game"

Did they forget about Star Wars Galaxies?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

publisher ubisoft

😞