this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
61 points (96.9% liked)

science

14061 readers
731 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A US lunar lander has "no chance" of making a soft landing on the Moon due to a fuel leak, the company behind the mission says.

Pittsburgh-based Astrobotic said there was enough propellant to operate its Peregrine lander as a spacecraft.

The lander is expected to run out of fuel in about 40 hours, the firm said shortly after 17:00 GMT on Tuesday.

Peregrine ran into trouble almost as soon as it came off the top of its launch rocket on Monday.

"Given the propellant leak, there is, unfortunately, no chance of a soft landing on the Moon," Astrobotic said in a statement posted on X, formerly Twitter.

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Truly the innovation offered only by the private sector

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Private companies are allowed to have many failures before they succeed, unlike NASA who lose public goodwill and therefore potentially lose funding when they fail. SpaceX blew up a ton of rockets before they succeeded in having the first reusable rocket. It's much faster to iterate this way but also more expensive, so NASA cant really operate this way. Although on the other hand all the private aerospace companies seem to rely on government subsidies so it's pretty crappy we cant just fund NASA more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@PoopingCough @SkybreakerEngineer
How about a different model where multiple governments fund a project so NASA is just one member, and give the project a name separate from nasa. Then when the natural fails occur they aren’t owned by nasa. Keeps the oligarchs out of the mix…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Points at SpaceX

[–] Bakkoda 1 points 7 months ago

They didn't get the extended warranty.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Land it hard then 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

FR It ain't like anyone's gonna be popping by for a visit. Landed nicely on the surface or energetically buried 30m below the surface, the ashes are still on the moon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

a lunar orbital space station sure would be handy

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Shouldn't have stuck that stupid fucking Bitcoin shit inside.