this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
134 points (95.3% liked)

politics

19170 readers
5262 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For context more than 106,000 US citizens died of drug overdoses in 2021, and more than 109,000 in 2022 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2021/20211117.htm

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How about we start at home like, I dunno, actually punishing the people responsible for the opioid epidemic (Purdue, the Sacklers, etc.)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, and let's not forget, freeing all the people that just did drugs rather then, well selling or distributing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Pfft and get rid of legal in-the-constitution slavery and harm for-profit prison's income? No way!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Massachusetts has entered the chat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Because the Sacklers pay our politicians.

Also because we totally won when the Sacklers’ business entities had to pay a fine but left the people themselves…still rich beyond reason and at liberty.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ll point out the sacklers aren’t the ones using state banks to launder cartel money so they can import more fentanyl precursors

Congress definitely has a hard on for war with China but the left ignores this stuff at our own peril

https://www.propublica.org/article/china-cartels-xizhi-li-money-laundering

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The right tenor is about fighting corruption and organized crime with financial reform, and sanctions relating to money laundering and manufacture is exactly that

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

weird how it works By the way, it’s not that I am pro-China on this one. Just weird how it all goes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

But how else do you keep your donors happy and drive your country to war with China?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally feel that we should do nothing. maintaining the status quo in regards to international trade is far more crucial than some junkies ODing, regardless of which cartel is importing the drugs

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that sometimes but a lot of opioid addicts started as patients receiving legitimate treatment for things such as car crashes and back injuries with poor off-ramping practices

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

that may be the case, but you know the saying about omelets and cracked eggs? it applies here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any excuse to inch us closer to war with China

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

That war machine isn't gonna fuel itself! We need one or two big ones soon to be on track to mimic the 20th century in every way!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please no more provocations, I don't want an all out war between America and China in my lifetime.

[–] vaultdweller013 4 points 1 year ago

I severly doubt China would be able to get the US to treat it like an all out war. Remember China struggles to influence its neighbors militarily, the US can run a war in a land locked and very hostile nation for twenty fucking years. The fact of the matter is that a war between the US and China would probably resemble a seal clubing more than anything else, unless China does the funny and makes my username weirdly relevant.