this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
186 points (95.1% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3687 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 85 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If only Trump supporters were silent. What kind of silent majority goes around with flags on their trucks blocking traffic and honking horns?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I saw some idiot today following his wife around the grocery store with his trump shirt, hat, and jacket. It's just such a dumb thing to make your whole personality.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

They have no personality otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

And then there are the people who have been flying Trump 2024 flags outside of their houses since 2020. There's one near me that's so faded and ragged (Made in the USA, I'm sure, definitely not cheap Chinese crap) that you can barely tell it's a Trump flag.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

What kind of fucking moron could mistake his supporters as "silent" they literally never shut up. Their listening to speaking ratio is probably the lowest in the history of humanity counting the deaf.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago

The New York Times. Absolutely one of the main drivers of trump’s 2016 illegitimate “win”.

More “her emails” articles than “trump is a demented rapist fraud” articles by 100%!

More “her emails” articles than anyone else in history!

Fuck the NYT. Fascist bootlickers, putting all the actual questions in the Opinion section, leaving “Trump Cages Children, Liberals Outraged” to the front page. Fuckers.

They betray journalism itself. Own it you bastards! Dissolve out of shame!

[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What gave it away? Was it that he lost the popular vote twice?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

I think it was the reporters going into a diner try try and interview a bunch of his supporters and finding that the place had been closed for a few years. /s

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago

Yeah he speaks for the extremely vocal minority

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So maybe the silent majority needs to start finding their fucking voices.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The silent majority very specifically is unengaged, and that's where swing voters come from.

It is a well-known (in political circles) electoral truth that all the money spent, all the speeches, and all the commercials, exist only to persuade about 7-8% of people that are otherwise totally disengaged and have no prior opinions.

This is how elections are won right now, for better or for worse.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It’s for good reason that the results of the 2016 presidential race shocked, surprised and unsettled many millions of Americans, including the small class of people who write about and interpret politics for a living.

Republicans vastly underperformed expectations in the House, winning back the chamber with a razor-thin margin, and Democrats secured governorships in Kansas, Michigan and Wisconsin, among other states.

“Since 2016,” wrote Michael Podhorzer, a former political director for the A.F.L.-C.I.O., in a post for his newsletter last summer, “Republicans have lost 23 of the 27 elections in the five states everyone agrees Democratic hopes in the Electoral College and the Senate depend on.”

There’s been no shortage of critics of the disqualification effort who have asked us to consider the consequences for American democracy if Trump’s supporters believe he was cheated out of a chance to run for president a third time.

But I think we should also consider the consequences for American democracy if the nation’s anti-MAGA majority comes to believe, with good reason, that the rules — and the Constitution — don’t apply to Trump.

While the squash cooks, prepare the dressing: In a small bowl, whisk the olive oil, pomegranate molasses, honey, cumin, cayenne and black pepper.


The original article contains 1,359 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I thought at first “while the squash cooks” was the beginning of an idiom i’ve never heard.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Shh…that’s the secret coded message for the rebellion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Drink more ovaltine