this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
175 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16371 readers
911 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago (3 children)

To see this content please enable targeting cookies.

Well that's incredibly sketchy of this website. I don't know if I'm missing any of the article, but assuming I'm not, the story is cool; but the presentation is super sus.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Every time a site tries that one, I just activate Firefox's reader view. Title, article, the one related pic, ok thx bye.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Oh, good call. I didn't even think of reader view, but that would've been perfect here. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Quickly searched for an alternative Article, because I am also not a fan of targeting Cookies.

For anyone interested in at least getting some basic Infos:

https://www.dfworkshop.net/

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Daggerfall remains, to this day, one of the best games ever made. I still have my original boxed copy, and several pre-patched CDs that Bethesda would mail out back in the day. I replay it a few times a year, because it's held up so well and there is nothing else that scratches the same itch.

I frequently wonder what Bethesda would be like today if Peterson, Lakshman, and Lefay had stayed at the company and Todd had been chased out, instead. Those three created The Elder Scrolls from scratch - lore, gameplay concepts, all of it. They had a TES Bible covering the story from Arena to Oblivion... and one by one, Todd excised all their influence from the franchise.

I miss the oppressive, grimdark atmosphere and lore, the complex world simulation, the unprecedented freedom, the unflinching maturity, and the epic, massive dungeon crawls.

I don't see anyone trying to make a game like that again, ever. Certainly not Todd Howard's Bethesda.

[–] AMillionNames 2 points 8 months ago

Grimdark? That's not the way I remember it.

They moved away with procedural generation when they worked on the creation kit first released with Morrowind, which has gotten a lot of use since then: Oblivion, Skyrim, Fallout 3, Fallout New Vegas, Fallout 4. So, uhm, I don't think it had gone that bad for BGS just because it's latest release is a flawed update of the engine.

Daggerfall is a fun slog where everything is pseudo procedurally generated and the boredom aspect comes when you become aware of the general repetitiveness of the engine, but it is very grindable because it is essentially all radiant quests and because it has very dynamic systems - which also work out to very exploitable systems to easily reach godlike power with little effort. Because you don't have to listen to exposition and can just go nuts on the gameplay, it's very replayable. Unfortunately, they seem to want to go back to the Daggerfall procedural generation system without really having the engine, which was designed to move away from that, configured for it, and it's going to be much harder.