Yes, all companies should be required to climate risk.
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
35 points (94.9% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5239 readers
287 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
And here I thought they were climate risking this whole time.
CNN’s headline writers not talking to their webpage title writers … A new rule requiring companies to disclose how much they pollute is coming in 2024
This, and also I downvoted for the inclusion of the utterly useless "Here's what you need to know".
This is really important. Just the fact that the backlash from the fossil fuel industry was so massive shows you how much this law can actually change. Mind you it is just a report, but everybody knows that climate change is real and that means governments should pass laws to tackle polluters. So companies with huge carbon footprints will be under attack by the government. Investors do not like that, but this gives them the choice to choose cleaner companies.
Rule or laws are the key point. Not voluntary participation. We should not allow polluting industries to decide their own terms of service