this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1823 readers
1 users here now

Everything about Linux

RULES

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Tldr: No need to switch yet.

I admire the endurance of the wayland devs though.

Edit: added tldr

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're using KDE, the improvement will be amazing.

Would never switch back

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I do. What's the difference?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The compositor works way more precisely. The tearing is gone, font rendering and high resoltution images are way better displayed. Multi monitor setups are better, including different scales for different monitors.

I think there are more, but these are the improvements on wayland I recognised during the last half a year.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is so much smoother in literally everything, even on insanely powerful hardware.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Smoother? Can you give a specific example?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Try dragging windows on x, then try on wayland. It's a very clear difference.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's standard on Fedora already. But I remember first hearing about Wayland many years ago. So, definitely Kudos to the Devs 🙂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unfortunately in production use Wayland feels like X.org from around 2000 (before the renaming). I was told not to worry about 'corner cases' but when small bugs pop up daily I just can't drive Wayland on my main office machine, although I'd really like to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've been using Wayland almost exclusively for around 2 years now and have had a way more stable and enjoyable experience than with X. Especially mixed refresh rate, VRR and scaling work way better, and the added security gives me peace of mind that sketchy / insecure apps aren't spying on me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Give examples? Apart from RDP not being functional I don't see any reason for a simple office box.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My trouble is the Wayland Desktop session in Ubuntu LTS or openSuSE-Leap silently failing ever so often on different machines after a Wayland update. On production machines that's not something I can tolerate nor have the time to investigate, with my employees waiting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

LTS is just bad when you need up to date systems.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, you gonna need to give more context!
Your comment has no baseline.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That was not a statement of my own, I just rephrased the conclusion of the article.

load more comments
view more: next ›