this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1823 readers
1 users here now

Everything about Linux

RULES

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unfortunately in production use Wayland feels like X.org from around 2000 (before the renaming). I was told not to worry about 'corner cases' but when small bugs pop up daily I just can't drive Wayland on my main office machine, although I'd really like to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've been using Wayland almost exclusively for around 2 years now and have had a way more stable and enjoyable experience than with X. Especially mixed refresh rate, VRR and scaling work way better, and the added security gives me peace of mind that sketchy / insecure apps aren't spying on me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Give examples? Apart from RDP not being functional I don't see any reason for a simple office box.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My trouble is the Wayland Desktop session in Ubuntu LTS or openSuSE-Leap silently failing ever so often on different machines after a Wayland update. On production machines that's not something I can tolerate nor have the time to investigate, with my employees waiting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

LTS is just bad when you need up to date systems.