this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
346 points (99.1% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7728 readers
2 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
346
Beehaw* defederated us? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by can to c/main
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DioTheSuperiorWaifi 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would this mean that there'll be no access to communities on Beehaw?
Could someone list the popular communities in Beehaw and their alternatives on other instances?
I think that'd be useful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (13 children)

but I can still access beehaw from lemmy.world and post on beehaw - so it has yet to occur or something's fucky

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Maybe making an account in a big instance is not that great of an idea after all. What benefit does it actually have?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

100%. The best instance to be on is actually your own. Failing that, a small one where the admins are easy to get a hold of.

Big ones that offer extra goodies might become a thing ala Gmail, but I expect they will vet and monitor their users so nobody has to block them.

Edit: Annoyingly, I can't respond to Kbin users,

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At some point they will change to whitelist, which will ban all single user instance as well.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The root problem is that identity is tied to an instance at all. For a federated system, the lack of federated identity / single sign on is baffling.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There's a possible future where major fediverse sites switch to whitelisted federation to deal with spam etc. At that point, your small instance would have to petition all the major players to be let in. That would probably kill off most small instances.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

big instances are more likely to stay up. smaller instances may just be some random user who might not be as interested in maintaining the site and may end up closing it. this happened to me when I used mastodon, I joined a smaller instance and they ended up shutting down.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Can't bothered beehaw users just simply block the instances they don't like by themselfes? Does this have to be instance-wide?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

It‘s the bubble concept I already curated for myself on Reddit by filtering out what feels like half the website. Except now I can sort of choose my pre-made bubble, which is more effort to be certain (have to research the admins of a chosen instance a bit and understand their rules and values), but I don‘t mind that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Do subscribed users from the blocked instances still count against their communities' totals?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ImFresh3x 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Ok so which instance is not slow and still has access to most content?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] httpjames 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I was really enjoying some of Beehaw's communities... Can TheDude request a re-federation?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I think it's actually Beehaw

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›