this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
233 points (98.7% liked)

News

22869 readers
4224 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Beginning on August 1, children in Arkansas under the age of 16 will no longer need employment certificates to work, thanks to a law passed in the last legislative session.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It must be nice to see children as an exploitable resource. And in classic conservative posturing you equate child labour with refereeing soccer games at age 14. Must be nice to look back and have such pleasant memories. I doubt these kids will be so wistful about industrialised farming, chicken preparation or other sweatshop jobs. I'm pretty certain you don't even see these kids.

At 14 you had the support of your parents and a safety net of laws that made it so their oversight was baked into your employment. Lots of kids are poor and have families who can't offer the sort of support and financial security you enjoyed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Children are not just an exploitable resource, they are a renewable one!

But yeah. I was one of those 14 year olds working jobs that were meant for adults. I don't really have strong opinions about this law change but I am in the position that my kids will never have to do what I had to do as a teen.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah the classic "fuck you, got mine".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Not at all. It's the exact opposite.

I want other kids to be able to have similar experiences with working and earning money.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What do you mean by this?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Either you are responding in error or the person I replied to is your alt. Please clarify.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is not an accurate characterization of my view.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're free to clarify at any point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you open to changing your view on aspects of this and discussing this topic with nuance?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You proferred the opinion so you need to clarify. I don't need to be open to what you consider nuance.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for your acknowledgement that you're unwilling to look at this situation with the level of nuance required.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That isn't what I said and you know it. If you feel misunderstood the onus is solely on you to clarify any misunderstanding. Pretending that you're making this about me isn't going to change your bad take or initial downvotes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks to me like you strawmanned them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks to me like you agree with them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Agree or not won't change the logic of what you said.