this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
250 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

69156 readers
2935 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Who do you think setup and owns the HDMI foundation?

Sony, Panasonic, Toshiba, Philips etc...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So? I dont follow, how does that change things?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Youve lost me, why would the TV manufacturers who get royalties from licensing HDMI want to offer a free alternative?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The TV manufacturers own the HDMI foundation.

Other devices being "forced" to implement HDMI ports, because every TV has them, might benefit those TV manufacturers.

Not sure how exactly that would work, I assume it gives them some level of control/power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

OK thanks for the explanation, I'm still a bit lost, but oh well ^^

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If they're profiting more than they're paying for maintaining this standard as the default then they don't want it to change