this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
145 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2091 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm talking about all the people that disingenuously demean what it means to actually support genocide. Left and right. Including the person you responded to. Don't get me wrong. Biden committed an extremely bone-headed unforced error. That anyone could have told him would blow up in his face. There is nothing he could do to get Bibi to listen.

No one that accuses Biden or any of the other progressives of supporting genocide is being genuine or sincere. They are being drama queens and simply alienating their allies. There's no end of things to criticize Biden for without making things up. And people win no points for it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is nothing he could do to get Bibi to listen.

You mean... apart from cutting Israel off from the massive arms supplies the US has been supplying Israel with since the 70s?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Which would not have actually stopped. What was going on. This is what I'm talking about overly simplistic unrealistic reasoning and expectations. I agree that he should not have sent them.

Part of the problem is, and I agree we should ditch it. That Israel is our most important military foothold in the region. It's why he feels so obligated to give netanyahu unwarranted diplomacy. And also causing a lot of antagonism in the region.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Which would not have actually stopped. What was going on

Yes. It would have stopped it. Israel wouldn't last a week without US support. It's a client state - no different than Saudi Arabia.

That Israel is our most important military foothold in the region.

And since when do you require a "foothold in the region?" Do tell... how has a thousand dead Palestinians, Iraqis or Afghans made your life better this week?

[–] agentsquirrel 7 points 8 months ago

since when do you require a “foothold in the region?”

Since oil and cars.